Mishkind Matthew C, Yannacone Alexandra, Lopez Amy, Jortberg Bonnie T, Sherrill Ashley, Mescher Teresa
Department of Psychiatry, Helen and Arthur E Johnson Depression Center, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045 USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Community Engagement Service, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA.
J Technol Behav Sci. 2023 Jan 30:1-8. doi: 10.1007/s41347-023-00301-w.
Most suicides occur among adults of working age and workplace suicide prevention is a public health priority. Workplace suicide prevention efforts, however, remain limited. This paper describes and evaluates a workplace-based suicide prevention gatekeeper training delivered in-person and virtually. VitalCog is a 2-h suicide prevention program designed specifically for the workplace and based on best practices for gatekeeper training. It is designed to be practical and interactive, with four modules (why prevention matters, what to do if someone is suicidal, conversations about suicide, and postvention), each containing related video, group discussion, and role play exercise components. It was delivered live by experienced trainers either in-person or using synchronous technologies between 2018 and 2021. A mixed methods pre- and post-training design with no control group was used to evaluate in-person vs. virtual delivery to determine knowledge gain, confidence identifying warning signs, and comfort levels talking about suicide. One thousand two-hundred and forty-four (1244) pre- and post-training responses were analyzed, with no significant ( > .05) socio-economic differences between the pre-training and post-training respondent samples. Both in-person ( = 841) and virtual ( = 403) training groups demonstrated statistically significant increases in knowledge about suicide prevention and seeking help, confidence to identify suicide warning signs, and comfort levels talking to someone about getting help. Interestingly, the virtual group showed higher post-training outcome scores than the in-person group. While COVID-19 significantly reduced in-person training opportunities, these results suggest that offering VitalCog virtually is as effective as in-person, and potentially has advantages over in-person training.
大多数自杀事件发生在工作年龄的成年人中,预防工作场所自杀是公共卫生的优先事项。然而,工作场所自杀预防措施仍然有限。本文描述并评估了一种以工作场所为基础的守门人自杀预防培训,该培训通过面对面和虚拟方式进行。VitalCog是一个为期2小时的自杀预防项目,专门为工作场所设计,并基于守门人培训的最佳实践。它旨在具有实用性和互动性,包含四个模块(预防为何重要、如果有人有自杀倾向该怎么做、关于自杀的对话以及善后处理),每个模块都包含相关视频、小组讨论和角色扮演练习部分。在2018年至2021年期间,由经验丰富的培训师通过面对面或使用同步技术进行现场授课。采用了一种无对照组的混合方法培训前和培训后设计,以评估面对面授课与虚拟授课,以确定知识收获、识别警示信号的信心以及谈论自杀的舒适度。对1244份培训前和培训后的回复进行了分析,培训前和培训后回复样本之间没有显著的(>0.05)社会经济差异。面对面培训组(n = 841)和虚拟培训组(n = 403)在预防自杀和寻求帮助的知识、识别自杀警示信号的信心以及与他人谈论寻求帮助的舒适度方面均显示出统计学上的显著增加。有趣的是,虚拟培训组的培训后结果得分高于面对面培训组。虽然新冠疫情显著减少了面对面培训的机会,但这些结果表明,虚拟提供VitalCog与面对面授课一样有效,并且可能比面对面培训更具优势。