Pacheco Da Silva Emilie, Ngutuka Mélanie, Dumas Orianne, Orsi Laurent, Ait-Hadad Wassila, Lemire Pierre, Quentin Joane, Pin Isabelle, Varraso Raphäelle, Siroux Valérie, Le Moual Nicole
Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Inserm, Équipe d'Épidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, 94807 Villejuif, France
Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Inserm, Équipe d'Épidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, 94807 Villejuif, France.
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Apr;80(4):218-224. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108513. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
To evaluate the associations between the evolution of household use of cleaning products with the asthma symptom score and its evolution over 8 years.
Our study is based on 509 women participating in the last two surveys of the Epidemiological study on the Genetics and Environment of Asthma (EGEA) study (EGEA2: 2003-2007 (44 years, 19% current smokers) and EGEA3: 2011-2013). We assessed an asthma symptom score and the use of household cleaning products through standardised questionnaires. We studied longitudinal associations of the evolution of weekly use of irritant or spayed cleaning products with (1) the asthma symptom score at EGEA3 and a stable symptom score between EGEA2-EGEA3 (negative binomial models) and (2) the incidence/evolution of asthma symptoms between EGEA2-EGEA3 (logistic/polytomous logistic regressions). Models accounted for familial dependence and were adjusted for age, smoking status, body mass index and occupational exposure to asthmagens.
Persistent and increased (40% and 16%, respectively) weekly use of irritants or sprays were associated with a higher risk of asthma symptoms at EGEA3 (Mean Score Ratio (MSR)=1.51 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.14) and 1.33 (95% CI 0.85 to 2.08), respectively). A decreased use (19%) was associated with a lower risk of symptoms at EGEA3, compared with a persistent use (MSR=0.59 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.88)). We also observed an association between an increased use of sprays and the incidence of asthma symptoms (OR=2.30 (95% CI 1.08 to 4.91)), compared with no weekly use of irritants/sprays.
This longitudinal study, with repeated assessment of exposure and respiratory health, supports the hypothesis that a persistent or increased weekly use of sprayed cleaning products over time may have an adverse effect on the evolution of asthma symptoms.
评估家庭清洁产品使用情况的变化与哮喘症状评分及其8年演变之间的关联。
我们的研究基于509名参与哮喘遗传学与环境流行病学研究(EGEA)最后两次调查的女性(EGEA2:2003 - 2007年(44岁,19%为当前吸烟者)和EGEA3:2011 - 2013年)。我们通过标准化问卷评估哮喘症状评分和家庭清洁产品的使用情况。我们研究了刺激性或喷雾型清洁产品每周使用情况的变化与以下方面的纵向关联:(1)EGEA3时的哮喘症状评分以及EGEA2 - EGEA3之间稳定的症状评分(负二项模型),以及(2)EGEA2 - EGEA3之间哮喘症状的发生率/演变情况(逻辑/多分类逻辑回归)。模型考虑了家族依赖性,并针对年龄、吸烟状况、体重指数和职业性接触哮喘诱发因素进行了调整。
持续且每周使用刺激性产品或喷雾产品增加(分别为40%和16%)与EGEA3时哮喘症状风险较高相关(平均评分比(MSR)分别为1.51(95%置信区间1.06至2.14)和1.33(95%置信区间0.85至2.08))。与持续使用相比,使用量减少(19%)与EGEA3时症状风险较低相关(MSR = 0.59(95%置信区间0.39至0.88))。与每周不使用刺激性产品/喷雾产品相比,我们还观察到喷雾产品使用增加与哮喘症状发生率之间存在关联(比值比(OR)= 2.30(95%置信区间1.08至4.91))。
这项对暴露和呼吸健康进行重复评估的纵向研究支持以下假设:随着时间的推移,每周持续或增加使用喷雾型清洁产品可能会对哮喘症状的演变产生不利影响。