Hou L K, Zhang L P, Huang Y, Dong Z W, Xie H K, Zhang W, Wu W, Wu C Y
Department of Pathology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200433, China.
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 8;52(2):129-135. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20220927-00814.
To investigate the applicability of the 2021 WHO classification of thoracic tumors' new grading system for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma (IPA) with different clinical stages and its correlation with the characteristics of targeted genes' variation. A total of 2 467 patients with surgically resected primary IPA in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China from September to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible cases were graded using the new grading system of IPA of the 2021 WHO classification of thoracic tumors. The clinicopathological data and targeted-gene abnormality were collected. The utility of new grading system of IPA in different clinical stages was investigated. The correlation of clinicopathological features and targeted-gene abnormality in different grades of IPA were compared. All 2 311 cases of IPA were included. There were 2 046 cases of stage Ⅰ IPA (88.5%), 169 cases of stage Ⅱ (7.3%), and 96 cases of stage Ⅲ (4.2%). According to the new classification system of IPA, 186 cases (9.1%), 1 413 cases (69.1%) and 447 cases (21.8%) of stage-Ⅰ adenocarcinoma were classified as Grade 1, Grade 2 and Grade 3, respectively. However, there were no Grade 1 adenocarcinomas in stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ cases. Among stage-Ⅱ and Ⅲ IPA cases, there were 38 Grade 2 cases (22.5%) and 131 Grade 3 cases (77.5%), and 3 Grade 2 cases (3.1%) and 93 Grade 3 cases (96.9%), respectively. In stage-Ⅰ cases, no tumor cells spreading through airspace (STAS), vascular invasion or pleural invasion was found in Grade 1 of IPA, while the positive rates of STAS in Grade 2 and 3 IPA cases were 11.3% (159/1 413) and 73.2% (327/447), respectively. There was a significant difference among the three grades (<0.01). Similarly, the rates of vascular and pleural invasion in Grade 3 IPA cases were 21.3% (95/447) and 75.8% (339/447), respectively, which were significantly higher than those of 1.3% (19/1 413) and 3.0% (42/1 413) in Grade 2 (<0.01). EGFR mutational rates in Grades 1, 2 and 3 IPA were 65.7% (94/143), 76.4% (984/1 288) and 51.3% (216/421), respectively. The differences among the three grades were statistically significant (<0.01). No fusion genes were detected in Grade 1 IPA, while the positive rates of ROS1 and ALK fusion genes in Grade 3 were 2.4% (10/421) and 8.3% (35/421), respectively, which were significantly higher than that of 0.5% (7/1 288) and 1.6% (20/1 288) in Grade 2 (<0.01). In stage-Ⅱ cases, only EGFR mutation rate in Grade 2 adenocarcinoma (31/37, 83.8%) was higher than that in Grade 3 adenocarcinoma (71/123, 57.7%; <0.01). However, the correlation between the new grade system of IPA and the distribution characteristics of targeted-gene variation cannot be evaluated in stage Ⅲ cases. The new grading system for IPA is mainly applicable to clinical stage-Ⅰ patients. Tumor grades of IPA are strongly correlated with the high-risk factors of prognosis and the distribution features of therapeutic targets. It is of great significance and clinical value to manage postoperative patients with early-stage IPA.
探讨2021年世界卫生组织(WHO)胸肿瘤分类新分级系统对不同临床分期的浸润性肺腺癌(IPA)的适用性及其与靶向基因变异特征的相关性。回顾性分析了2020年9月至12月在中国上海肺科医院手术切除的2467例原发性IPA患者。采用2021年WHO胸肿瘤分类中IPA的新分级系统对符合条件的病例进行分级。收集临床病理数据和靶向基因异常情况。研究IPA新分级系统在不同临床分期中的应用情况。比较不同分级的IPA中临床病理特征与靶向基因异常的相关性。纳入所有2311例IPA病例。其中Ⅰ期IPA 2046例(88.5%),Ⅱ期169例(7.3%),Ⅲ期96例(4.2%)。根据IPA新分类系统,Ⅰ期腺癌中186例(9.1%)、1413例(69.1%)和447例(21.8%)分别被分类为1级、2级和3级。然而,Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期病例中无1级腺癌。在Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期IPA病例中,分别有38例2级病例(22.5%)和131例3级病例(77.5%),以及3例2级病例(3.1%)和93例3级病例(96.9%)。在Ⅰ期病例中,IPA 1级未见肿瘤细胞气腔播散(STAS)、血管侵犯或胸膜侵犯,而IPA 2级和3级病例中STAS阳性率分别为11.3%(159/1413)和73.2%(327/447),三级之间差异有统计学意义(<0.01)。同样,IPA 3级病例中血管侵犯和胸膜侵犯率分别为21.3%(95/447)和75.8%(339/447),显著高于2级中的1.3%(19/1413)和3.0%(42/1413)(<0.01)。IPA 1级、2级和3级的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变率分别为65.7%(94/143)、76.4%(984/1288)和51.3%(216/421),三级之间差异有统计学意义(<0.01)。IPA 1级未检测到融合基因,而IPA 3级中ROS1和间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)融合基因阳性率分别为2.4%(10/421)和8.3%(35/421),显著高于2级中的0.5%(7/1288)和1.6%(20/1288)(<0.01)。在Ⅱ期病例中,仅2级腺癌的EGFR突变率(31/37,83.8%)高于3级腺癌(71/123,57.7%;<0.01)。然而,Ⅲ期病例中无法评估IPA新分级系统与靶向基因变异分布特征之间的相关性。IPA新分级系统主要适用于临床Ⅰ期患者。IPA的肿瘤分级与预后高危因素及治疗靶点分布特征密切相关。对早期IPA术后患者的管理具有重要意义和临床价值。