Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai, China.
Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Feb 8;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01174-0.
Failures in drug trials strengthen the necessity to further determine the neuropathological events during the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We sought to investigate the dynamic changes and performance of plasma biomarkers across the entire Alzheimer's continuum in the Chinese population.
Plasma amyloid-β (Αβ)42, Aβ40, Aβ42/Aβ40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181, neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were measured utilizing the ultrasensitive single-molecule array technology across the AD continuum (n=206), wherein Aβ status was defined by the values of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42 or Aβ positron emission tomography (PET). Their trajectories were compared with those of putative CSF biomarkers.
Plasma GFAP and p-tau181 increased only in Aβ-positive individuals throughout aging, whereas NfL increased with aging regardless of Aβ status. Among the plasma biomarkers studied, GFAP was the one that changed first. It had a prominent elevation early in the cognitively unimpaired (CU) A+T- phase (CU A+T- phase: 97.10±41.29 pg/ml; CU A-T- phase: 49.18±14.39 pg/ml; p<0.001). From preclinical to symptomatic stages of AD, plasma GFAP started to rise sharply as soon as CSF Aβ became abnormal and continued to increase until reaching its highest level during the AD dementia phase. The greatest slope of change was seen in plasma GFAP. This is followed by CSF p-tau181 and total-tau, and, to a lesser extent, then plasma p-tau181. In contrast, the changes in plasma NfL, Aβ42/Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ40 were less pronounced. Of note, these plasma biomarkers exhibited smaller dynamic ranges than their CSF counterparts, except for GFAP which was the opposite. Plasma GFAP and p-tau181 were tightly associated with AD pathologies and amyloid tracer uptake in widespread brain areas. Plasma GFAP could accurately identify CSF Aβ42 (area under the curve (AUC)=0.911) and Aβ PET (AUC=0.971) positivity. Plasma p-tau181 also performed well in discriminating Aβ PET status (AUC=0.916), whereas the discriminative accuracy was relatively low for other plasma biomarkers.
This study is the first to delineate the trajectories of plasma biomarkers throughout the Alzheimer's continuum in the Chinese population, providing important implications for future trials targeting plasma GFAP to facilitate AD prevention and treatment.
药物试验的失败加强了进一步确定阿尔茨海默病(AD)发展过程中神经病理学事件的必要性。我们试图研究在中国人群中整个 AD 连续体中血浆生物标志物的动态变化和表现。
利用超敏单分子阵列技术在 AD 连续体中测量血浆淀粉样蛋白-β(Αβ)42、Αβ40、Αβ42/Αβ40、磷酸化 tau(p-tau)181、神经丝轻链(NfL)和神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP),其中 Aβ 状态由脑脊液(CSF)Aβ42 或 Aβ 正电子发射断层扫描(PET)值定义。将它们的轨迹与潜在的 CSF 生物标志物进行比较。
在整个衰老过程中,只有在 Aβ 阳性个体中,血浆 GFAP 和 p-tau181 才会增加,而 NfL 则无论 Aβ 状态如何都会随着衰老而增加。在所研究的血浆生物标志物中,GFAP 是最早发生变化的标志物。它在认知未受损(CU)A+T-期(CU A+T-期:97.10±41.29 pg/ml;CU A-T-期:49.18±14.39 pg/ml;p<0.001)就有明显升高。从 AD 的临床前到症状阶段,一旦 CSF Aβ 变得异常,血浆 GFAP 就开始急剧上升,并持续升高,直到 AD 痴呆阶段达到最高水平。变化最大的斜率是血浆 GFAP。其次是 CSF p-tau181 和总 tau,程度较小,然后是血浆 p-tau181。相比之下,血浆 NfL、Αβ42/Αβ40、Αβ42 和 Αβ40 的变化不太明显。值得注意的是,除了 GFAP 相反,这些血浆生物标志物的动态范围都小于其 CSF 对应物。血浆 GFAP 和 p-tau181 与 AD 病理学和广泛脑区的淀粉样蛋白示踪剂摄取密切相关。血浆 GFAP 可准确识别 CSF Aβ42(曲线下面积(AUC)=0.911)和 Aβ PET(AUC=0.971)阳性。血浆 p-tau181 也能很好地区分 Aβ PET 状态(AUC=0.916),而其他血浆生物标志物的判别准确率相对较低。
这项研究首次描绘了中国人群 AD 连续体中血浆生物标志物的轨迹,为未来靶向血浆 GFAP 以促进 AD 预防和治疗的试验提供了重要意义。