Chuang Kai-Ti, Chu Yu-Ying, Chen Chien-Tzung, Liao Han Tsung
From the Division of traumatic plasty, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive surgery, LinKou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Guishan district, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Apr 1;90(1 Suppl 1):S26-S31. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003355. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Motorcycle injuries remain a significant cause of motor vehicle-related morbidity and mortality in Taiwan. Besides, the facial region is a commonly fractured site under motorcycle accidents. To date, there are no trauma mechanism-based studies of facial fractures.
This study aims to determine the facial fracture patterns, the severity of head trauma, and associated injuries by different motorcycle-related trauma mechanisms enabling a greater understanding of its distribution and magnitude.
This is a retrospective descriptive analysis conducted over a 2-year period at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. We focused on the population of maxillofacial injury caused by motorcycle accidents. We divided the patient cohort into 3 main trauma mechanisms: single-motorcycle collision (SM group), motorcycle-to-motorcycle collision (MM group), motorcycle-to-vehicle collision (MV group). Data, including demographics, age, fracture patterns of facial bones, and other associated injuries, were collected.
A total of 881 cases were identified that involved facial fractures. Most patients were male (71%), young adult (mean age, 32.49 years), and the most common fracture region is the midfacial fracture (79.5%, 700 victims). Among the 3 groups, the MM group was less likely to sustain severe injuries by trauma score system, less head injury and mortality rate. The MV group and SM group have similar mortality rates but different fracture pattern tendencies. Lower facial fractures were more likely in the MV group, but midface fractures in the SM group. Associated injuries were higher in the MV group.
Our study presents the different trends of fracture patterns and injury under 3 main mechanisms of motorcycle casualties. We document all these data in the hope of providing insights into trauma doctors dealing with motorcycle accidents.
在台湾,摩托车伤害仍是机动车相关发病和死亡的重要原因。此外,面部是摩托车事故中常见的骨折部位。迄今为止,尚无基于创伤机制的面部骨折研究。
本研究旨在确定不同摩托车相关创伤机制导致的面部骨折模式、头部创伤严重程度及相关损伤,以便更好地了解其分布和严重程度。
这是一项在林口长庚纪念医院进行的为期2年的回顾性描述性分析。我们聚焦于摩托车事故导致的颌面损伤人群。我们将患者队列分为3种主要创伤机制:单摩托车碰撞(SM组)、摩托车对摩托车碰撞(MM组)、摩托车对车辆碰撞(MV组)。收集了包括人口统计学、年龄、面部骨骼骨折模式及其他相关损伤的数据。
共确定881例涉及面部骨折的病例。大多数患者为男性(71%),是年轻成年人(平均年龄32.49岁),最常见的骨折区域是面中部骨折(79.5%,700名受害者)。在这3组中,根据创伤评分系统,MM组受重伤的可能性较小,头部损伤和死亡率较低。MV组和SM组死亡率相似,但骨折模式倾向不同。MV组更易发生下颌骨骨折,而SM组更易发生面中部骨折。MV组的相关损伤更多。
我们的研究呈现了摩托车伤亡3种主要机制下骨折模式和损伤的不同趋势。我们记录所有这些数据,希望能为处理摩托车事故的创伤医生提供见解。