Suppr超能文献

贝叶斯单臂到双臂转换设计,同时使用短期和长期终点。

Bayesian single-to-double arm transition design using both short-term and long-term endpoints.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Pharm Stat. 2023 Jul-Aug;22(4):588-604. doi: 10.1002/pst.2292. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

Abstract

The choice between single-arm designs versus randomized double-arm designs has been contentiously debated in the literature of phase II oncology trials. Recently, as a compromise, the single-to-double arm transition design was proposed, combining the two designs into one trial over two stages. Successful implementation of the two-stage transition design requires a suspension period at the end of the first stage to collect the response data of the already enrolled patients. When the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint is overly long, the between-stage suspension period may unfavorably prolong the trial duration and cause a delay in treating future eligible patients. To accelerate the trial, we propose a Bayesian single-to-double arm design with short-term endpoints (BSDS), where an intermediate short-term endpoint is used for making early termination decisions at the end of the single-arm stage, followed by an evaluation of the long-term endpoint at the end of the subsequent double-arm stage. Bayesian posterior probabilities are used as the primary decision-making tool at the end of the trial. Design calibration steps are proposed for this Bayesian monitoring process to control the frequentist operating characteristics and minimize the expected sample size. Extensive simulation studies have demonstrated that our design has comparable power and average sample size but a much shorter trial duration than conventional single-to-double arm design. Applications of the design are illustrated using two phase II oncology trials with binary endpoints.

摘要

在肿瘤学 II 期临床试验文献中,单臂设计与随机双臂设计的选择一直存在争议。最近,作为一种折衷方案,提出了单臂到双臂过渡设计,将这两种设计合并为一个两阶段试验。两阶段过渡设计的成功实施需要在第一阶段结束时暂停一段时间,以收集已入组患者的反应数据。当主要疗效终点的评估时间过长时,阶段间暂停时间可能会延长试验持续时间,并导致未来合格患者的治疗延迟。为了加速试验,我们提出了一种具有短期终点的贝叶斯单臂到双臂设计(BSDS),其中在单臂阶段结束时使用中间短期终点来做出早期终止决策,然后在随后的双臂阶段结束时评估长期终点。贝叶斯后验概率被用作试验结束时的主要决策工具。为这个贝叶斯监测过程提出了设计校准步骤,以控制频率主义操作特征并最小化预期样本量。广泛的模拟研究表明,与传统的单臂到双臂设计相比,我们的设计具有相当的功效和平均样本量,但试验持续时间要短得多。使用具有二项终点的两项肿瘤学 II 期临床试验说明了该设计的应用。

相似文献

1
Bayesian single-to-double arm transition design using both short-term and long-term endpoints.
Pharm Stat. 2023 Jul-Aug;22(4):588-604. doi: 10.1002/pst.2292. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
BASIC: A Bayesian adaptive synthetic-control design for phase II clinical trials.
Clin Trials. 2023 Oct;20(5):486-496. doi: 10.1177/17407745231176445. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
A randomized Bayesian optimal phase II design with binary endpoint.
J Biopharm Stat. 2023 Mar;33(2):151-166. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2094938. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
5
Bayesian single-arm phase II trial designs with time-to-event endpoints.
Pharm Stat. 2021 Nov;20(6):1235-1248. doi: 10.1002/pst.2143. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
6
Bayesian optimal phase II clinical trial design with time-to-event endpoint.
Pharm Stat. 2020 Nov;19(6):776-786. doi: 10.1002/pst.2030. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
A Bayesian-frequentist two-stage single-arm phase II clinical trial design.
Stat Med. 2012 Aug 30;31(19):2055-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.5330. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
10
Bayesian decision theoretic two-stage design in phase II clinical trials with survival endpoint.
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 30;31(17):1804-20. doi: 10.1002/sim.4511. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Extending the two-stage single arm phase II clinical trial design to the delayed response scenario.
Pharm Stat. 2022 Mar;21(2):317-326. doi: 10.1002/pst.2171. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
2
The use of local and nonlocal priors in Bayesian test-based monitoring for single-arm phase II clinical trials.
Pharm Stat. 2021 Nov;20(6):1183-1199. doi: 10.1002/pst.2139. Epub 2021 May 19.
4
Progression-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in oncology trials: a methodological systematic review.
Br J Cancer. 2020 May;122(11):1707-1714. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0805-y. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
5
START: single-to-double arm transition design for phase II clinical trials.
Pharm Stat. 2020 Jul;19(4):454-467. doi: 10.1002/pst.2005. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
6
A two-stage phase II clinical trial design with nested criteria for early stopping and efficacy.
Pharm Stat. 2019 Nov;18(6):700-713. doi: 10.1002/pst.1965. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
Addressing heterogeneity in the design of phase II clinical trials in geriatric oncology.
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.136. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
Radical radiation therapy for oligometastatic breast cancer: Results of a prospective phase II trial.
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jan;126(1):177-180. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.032. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints in Drug Development: A European Regulatory View.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 May 1;58(6):BIO27-BIO33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21778.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验