Suppr超能文献

C7 侧块螺钉与椎弓根螺钉:后路颈椎融合术后邻近节段病变和不愈合的再手术率。

Lateral Mass Screws Versus Pedicle Screws at C7: Reoperation Rates for Operative Adjacent Segment Disease and Nonunion in Posterior Cervical Fusion.

机构信息

Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA.

Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Jul 1;48(13):920-929. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004597. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic adjacent segment disease (operative ASD) and symptomatic nonunions (operative nonunions) in posterior cervical fusions (PCFs) stopping at C7 using either lateral mass screws (LMS) or cervical pedicle screws (CPS) at C7.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Stopping PCFs at C7 has been controversial because of the risks of adjacent segment disease or nonunions. The two commonly used fixation techniques at the C7 level are LMS and CPS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis from the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry identified a cohort of patients with cervical degenerative disk disease who underwent primary PCFs stopping at C7 with either LMS or CPS at C7. Demographic and operative data were extracted from the registry, and operative ASD and operative nonunions were adjudicated through chart review. Patients were followed until validated operative ASD or nonunion, membership termination, death, or end of study (March 31, 2022). Descriptive statistics and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were calculated for operative ASDs and operative nonunions.

RESULTS

We found 481 patients with PCFs stopping at C7 with either LMS (n=347) or CPS (n=134) at C7 with an average follow-up time of 5.6 (±3.8) years, time to operative ASD of 3.0 (±2.8) years, and to operative nonunion of 1.2 (±0.7) years. There were 11 operative ASDs (LMS=8, CPS=3) and eight operative nonunions (LMS=4, CPS=4). There was no statistical difference between patients stopping at C7 with LMS versus CPS for operative ASDs (HR: 0.68, 95% CI=0.17-2.77, P =0.60) or operative nonunions (HR: 2.09, 95% CI=0.45-8.58, P =0.37).

CONCLUSION

A large cohort of patients with PCFs stopping at C7 with an average follow-up of > 5 years found no statistical difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic ASD (operative ASD) or operative nonunion using either LMS or CPS at C7.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

确定在 C7 行后路颈椎融合术(PCF)中,使用侧块螺钉(LMS)或颈椎椎弓根螺钉(CPS)固定 C7 时,治疗症状性邻近节段疾病(手术性 ASD)和症状性不愈合(手术性非愈合)的再手术率是否存在差异。

背景资料概要

在 C7 处停止 PCF 一直存在争议,因为存在邻近节段疾病或不愈合的风险。在 C7 水平上使用的两种常用固定技术是 LMS 和 CPS。

材料和方法

从 Kaiser Permanente 脊柱登记处进行了一项回顾性分析,确定了一组患有颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病的患者,他们接受了 C7 处行后路颈椎融合术,在 C7 处使用 LMS 或 CPS 固定。从登记处提取人口统计学和手术数据,并通过图表审查判断手术性 ASD 和手术性不愈合。患者随访至经证实的手术性 ASD 或不愈合、会员资格终止、死亡或研究结束(2022 年 3 月 31 日)。对手术性 ASD 和手术性不愈合进行描述性统计和多变量 Cox 比例风险模型计算。

结果

我们发现 481 例 C7 处行后路颈椎融合术的患者,其中 347 例使用 LMS,134 例使用 CPS,平均随访时间为 5.6(±3.8)年,手术性 ASD 的时间为 3.0(±2.8)年,手术性不愈合的时间为 1.2(±0.7)年。共有 11 例手术性 ASD(LMS=8,CPS=3)和 8 例手术性不愈合(LMS=4,CPS=4)。LMS 与 CPS 治疗手术性 ASD(HR:0.68,95%CI=0.17-2.77,P=0.60)或手术性不愈合(HR:2.09,95%CI=0.45-8.58,P=0.37)的再手术率无统计学差异。

结论

在平均随访时间>5 年的 C7 处行后路颈椎融合术的大量患者中,使用 LMS 或 CPS 在 C7 处固定时,治疗症状性 ASD(手术性 ASD)或手术性不愈合的再手术率无统计学差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验