Suppr超能文献

无标记法是优还是劣?将一种用于马跛行评估的智能手机计算机视觉方法与多摄像头动作捕捉进行比较。

Is Markerless More or Less? Comparing a Smartphone Computer Vision Method for Equine Lameness Assessment to Multi-Camera Motion Capture.

作者信息

Lawin Felix Järemo, Byström Anna, Roepstorff Christoffer, Rhodin Marie, Almlöf Mattias, Silva Mudith, Andersen Pia Haubro, Kjellström Hedvig, Hernlund Elin

机构信息

Sleip AI, Birger Jarlsgatan 58, 11426 Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;13(3):390. doi: 10.3390/ani13030390.

Abstract

Computer vision is a subcategory of artificial intelligence focused on extraction of information from images and video. It provides a compelling new means for objective orthopaedic gait assessment in horses using accessible hardware, such as a smartphone, for markerless motion analysis. This study aimed to explore the lameness assessment capacity of a smartphone single camera (SC) markerless computer vision application by comparing measurements of the vertical motion of the head and pelvis to an optical motion capture multi-camera (MC) system using skin attached reflective markers. Twenty-five horses were recorded with a smartphone (60 Hz) and a 13 camera MC-system (200 Hz) while trotting two times back and forth on a 30 m runway. The smartphone video was processed using artificial neural networks detecting the horse's direction, action and motion of body segments. After filtering, the vertical displacement curves from the head and pelvis were synchronised between systems using cross-correlation. This rendered 655 and 404 matching stride segmented curves for the head and pelvis respectively. From the stride segmented vertical displacement signals, differences between the two minima (MinDiff) and the two maxima (MaxDiff) respectively per stride were compared between the systems. Trial mean difference between systems was 2.2 mm (range 0.0-8.7 mm) for head and 2.2 mm (range 0.0-6.5 mm) for pelvis. Within-trial standard deviations ranged between 3.1-28.1 mm for MC and between 3.6-26.2 mm for SC. The ease of use and good agreement with MC indicate that the SC application is a promising tool for detecting clinically relevant levels of asymmetry in horses, enabling frequent and convenient gait monitoring over time.

摘要

计算机视觉是人工智能的一个子类别,专注于从图像和视频中提取信息。它提供了一种引人注目的新方法,可使用智能手机等可访问硬件进行无标记运动分析,从而对马匹进行客观的骨科步态评估。本研究旨在通过将头部和骨盆垂直运动的测量结果与使用皮肤附着反射标记的光学运动捕捉多摄像头(MC)系统进行比较,探索智能手机单摄像头(SC)无标记计算机视觉应用的跛行评估能力。25匹马在30米的跑道上来回小跑两次时,用智能手机(60赫兹)和13摄像头MC系统(200赫兹)进行记录。使用人工神经网络处理智能手机视频,以检测马的方向、动作和身体部位的运动。经过滤波后,使用互相关在系统之间同步头部和骨盆的垂直位移曲线。这分别为头部和骨盆生成了655条和404条匹配的步幅分段曲线。从步幅分段的垂直位移信号中,比较了系统之间每步的两个最小值(MinDiff)和两个最大值(MaxDiff)之间的差异。系统间的试验平均差异,头部为2.2毫米(范围0.0 - 8.7毫米),骨盆为2.2毫米(范围0.0 - 6.5毫米)。试验内标准差,MC系统在3.1 - 28.1毫米之间,SC系统在3.6 - 26.2毫米之间。其易用性以及与MC系统的良好一致性表明SC应用是检测马匹临床相关不对称水平的一个有前途的工具,能够随着时间的推移进行频繁且便捷的步态监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46bc/9913208/3b8c37e10dd6/animals-13-00390-g0A1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验