Université Paris-Dauphine - PSL, Paris, France.
CEDLAS-IIE-Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;321:115759. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115759. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
As of December 2021, all former Communist countries from Central and Eastern Europe were still lagging behind in terms of COVID-19 vaccination rates in Europe. Can institutional legacy explain, at least in part, this heterogeneity in vaccination decisions across Europe? To study this question we exploit novel data from the second wave of the SHARE (Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe) COVID-19 Survey fielded in Summer (2021) that covers older individuals in 27 European countries. First, we document lower COVID-19 vaccine take-up amongst those who were born under Communism in Europe. Next, we turn to reunified Germany to get closer to a causal effect of having lived behind the Iron Curtain. We find that exposure to the Communist regime in East Germany decreased one's probability to get vaccinated against COVID-19 by 8 percentage points and increased that of refusing the vaccine by 4 percentage points. Both effects are large and statistically significant, and they hold when controlling for individual socio-economic and demographic characteristics. We explore several possible mechanisms. The East-West Germany gap does not seem to be explained by differences in the impact of the first wave of the pandemic or in general exposure to vaccines. We find that East Germans have lower social capital than West Germans and that social capital correlates negatively with Covid-10 vaccine uptake, but only a small fraction of the East-West Germany Covid-19 vaccination gap can be explained by our measures of social capital.
截至 2021 年 12 月,所有来自中东欧的前共产主义国家在欧洲的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率方面仍落后。制度遗产能否至少部分解释欧洲各地疫苗接种决策的这种异质性?为了研究这个问题,我们利用了 SHARE(欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查)COVID-19 调查第二波夏季(2021 年)的新数据,该调查涵盖了 27 个欧洲国家的老年人。首先,我们记录了在欧洲出生于共产主义时期的人 COVID-19 疫苗接种率较低。其次,我们转向统一后的德国,以更接近生活在铁幕后的因果效应。我们发现,东德的共产主义政权使人们接种 COVID-19 疫苗的可能性降低了 8 个百分点,而拒绝接种疫苗的可能性增加了 4 个百分点。这两种影响都很大,具有统计学意义,而且在控制了个人社会经济和人口特征后仍然成立。我们探讨了几种可能的机制。东德和西德之间的差距似乎不能用第一波大流行的影响或一般疫苗接种的差异来解释。我们发现,东德人的社会资本低于西德人,社会资本与 Covid-10 疫苗接种率呈负相关,但我们对社会资本的衡量指标只能解释东德和西德 COVID-19 疫苗接种差距的一小部分。