Suppr超能文献

新辅助PD-1抑制剂联合化疗后,微创与开放McKeown食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌患者的疗效比较

Minimally invasive versus open McKeown esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy.

作者信息

Chen Qiuming, Mo Shaocong, Aizemaiti Rusidanmu, Cheng Jun, Wu Ziheng, Ye Peng

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Digestive Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 27;13:1103421. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1103421. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare short and mid-term outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing open or minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE) after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced ESCC underwent open or minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy were retrospectively included from June 2019 to June 2021. The baseline characteristics, pathological data, short-and mid-term outcomes were collected and compared based on the surgical approach.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were included in the study. An open procedure was performed for 13 patients (37.1%), and 22 (62.9%) patients underwent MIE after neoadjuvant therapy. Compared with open group, MIE group had shorter operative times (350.8± 117.8 . 277.9 ± 30.2 min, P = 0.009). The total number of resected lymph nodes was not significantly different, but more left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes were harvested from the Open group (2.6 ± 3.2 . 0.9 ± 1.7, P = 0.047). The median follow-up time was 1.42 years (range, 0.35-2.59 years) from the first day of treatment. Three patients (8.6%) died during follow-up, one in the open surgery group and two in the MIE group. There were six (17.1%) patients developed recurrence, three in each group. The 2-year cumulative survival rates were 92.3 ± 7.4% and 89.5 ± 7.1% for the open and MIE groups, respectively. Overall survival was not different between the two surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

MIE might be safe and feasible for patients with locally advanced ESCC undergoing neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是比较接受新辅助PD-1抑制剂联合化疗后行开放或微创McKeown食管切除术(MIE)的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的短期和中期结局。

方法

回顾性纳入2019年6月至2021年6月期间接受新辅助PD-1抑制剂联合化疗后行开放或微创McKeown食管切除术的局部晚期ESCC患者。收集基线特征、病理数据、短期和中期结局,并根据手术方式进行比较。

结果

本研究共纳入35例患者。13例患者(37.1%)接受开放手术,22例患者(62.9%)在新辅助治疗后接受MIE。与开放手术组相比,MIE组手术时间更短(350.8±117.8对277.9±30.2分钟,P=0.009)。切除淋巴结总数无显著差异,但开放手术组清扫出更多左侧喉返淋巴结(2.6±3.2对0.9±1.7,P=0.047)。从治疗第一天起的中位随访时间为1.42年(范围0.35 - 2.59年)。随访期间3例患者(8.6%)死亡,开放手术组1例,MIE组2例。有6例患者(17.1%)复发,每组各3例。开放手术组和MIE组的2年累积生存率分别为92.3±7.4%和89.5±7.1%。两种手术方式的总生存率无差异。

结论

对于接受新辅助PD-1抑制剂联合化疗的局部晚期ESCC患者,MIE可能是安全可行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验