Centre for Public Health, Institute for Clinical Science A, Queen's University Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BJ, UK.
Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2023 May;82(2):186-199. doi: 10.1017/S0029665123002161. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
A high intake of fruit and vegetables (FV) has consistently been associated with a reduced risk of a number of non-communicable diseases. This evidence base is largely from prospective cohort studies, with meta-analyses demonstrating an association between increased FV intake and reduced risk of both CHD and stroke, although the evidence is less certain for cancer and diabetes. Controlled intervention trials examining either clinical or intermediate risk factor endpoints are more scarce. Therefore, evidence that FV consumption reduces the risk of disease is so far largely confined to observational epidemiology, which is hampered by some methodological uncertainties. Although increased FV intake is promoted across all dietary guidelines, national surveys confirm that dietary intakes are suboptimal and are not increasing over time. A range of barriers to increasing FV intake exist, including economic, physical and behavioural barriers that must be considered when exploring potential opportunities to change this, considering the feasibility of different approaches to encourage increased FV consumption. Such interventions must include consideration of context, for example, challenges and uncertainties which exist with the whole food system.
大量摄入水果和蔬菜(FV)与多种非传染性疾病风险降低密切相关。这一证据主要来自前瞻性队列研究,荟萃分析表明,增加 FV 摄入量与降低冠心病和中风风险之间存在关联,尽管癌症和糖尿病的证据不太确定。检查临床或中间危险因素终点的对照干预试验则更为稀缺。因此,到目前为止,FV 消费降低疾病风险的证据主要局限于观察性流行病学,该领域受到一些方法学不确定性的影响。尽管所有饮食指南都提倡增加 FV 摄入量,但国家调查证实,饮食摄入量并不理想,而且随着时间的推移并没有增加。增加 FV 摄入量存在一系列障碍,包括经济、身体和行为障碍,在探索改变这一状况的潜在机会时必须加以考虑,同时要考虑到不同方法促进增加 FV 消费的可行性。这些干预措施必须考虑到背景因素,例如,整个食品系统中存在的挑战和不确定性。