School of Information and Communication Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
CIBER Research, Newbury, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 15;18(2):e0281058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281058. eCollection 2023.
As part of the Harbnger-2 project, this study aimed to discover the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on junior researchers' work-life, career prospects, research and publishing practices and networking.
An online international survey of 800 early career researchers (ECRs) was conducted in 2022. A questionnaire was developed based on three rounds of interviews and distributed using multiple channels including publishers, social media, and direct email to ECRs.
The impact of the pandemic on career prospects, morale, job security, productivity, ability to network and collaborate, and quality and speed of peer review has on the whole been more negative than positive. A quarter of ECRs shifted their research focus to pandemic-related topics and half of those who did, benefited largely due to increased productivity and impact. The majority worked remotely/from home and more than two-thirds of those who did so benefitted from it. While virtual or hybrid conferences have been embraced by the majority of ECRs, around a third still preferred face-to-face only conferences. The use of library online platforms, Sci-Hub, ResearchGate, Google Scholar and smartphone to search and access full-text papers increased. ECRs prioritised journals with fast submission procedures for the publishing of their papers and spent more time on increasing the visibility of their research. Fees were a problem for publishing open access.
Although, generally, the pandemic negatively impacted many aspects of ECRs' work-life, certain research areas and individuals benefited from being more appreciated and valued, and, in some cases, resulted in increased resources, better productivity and greater impact. Changes, such as the use of digital technologies and remote working created new opportunities for some ECRs. While continuing work flexibility and hybrid conferences might benefit some ECRs, institutions should also take measures to help those ECRs whose career and productivity have been adversely impacted.
作为 Harbnger-2 项目的一部分,本研究旨在发现 COVID-19 大流行对初级研究人员的工作生活、职业前景、研究和出版实践以及网络联系的影响。
2022 年对 800 名初级研究人员(ECRs)进行了在线国际调查。根据三轮访谈开发了一份问卷,并通过多种渠道分发,包括出版商、社交媒体和直接向 ECRs 发送电子邮件。
大流行对职业前景、士气、工作保障、生产力、网络和合作能力以及同行评审的质量和速度的影响总体上是负面的多于正面的。四分之一的 ECRs 将研究重点转移到与大流行相关的主题,其中一半人受益于生产力和影响力的提高。大多数人远程工作/在家工作,超过三分之二的人从中受益。虽然大多数 ECRs都接受了虚拟或混合会议,但仍有大约三分之一的人更喜欢面对面的会议。图书馆在线平台、Sci-Hub、ResearchGate、Google Scholar 和智能手机的使用增加了,用于搜索和访问全文论文。ECRs 优先选择提交程序快捷的期刊来发表他们的论文,并花费更多时间提高他们研究的可见度。出版开放获取期刊的费用是一个问题。
尽管大流行总体上对 ECRs 的工作生活产生了负面影响,但某些研究领域和个人从中受益,受到了更多的重视和重视,在某些情况下,还获得了更多的资源、更高的生产力和更大的影响力。数字技术和远程工作的变革为一些 ECRs创造了新的机会。虽然继续保持工作灵活性和混合会议可能对一些 ECRs有利,但各机构也应采取措施,帮助那些职业和生产力受到不利影响的 ECRs。