Upper-neck irradiation versus standard whole-neck irradiation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of upper-neck irradiation versus standard whole-neck irradiation in patients with N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

METHODS

We conducted a PRISMA guideline based systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized clinical trials assessing upper-neck irradiation versus whole-neck irradiation with or without chemotherapy in non-metastatic N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were identified. The studies were searched on the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library up to March 2022. Survival outcomes, including overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival and relapse-free survival, and toxicities rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were two randomized clinical trials with 747 samples finally included. Upper-neck irradiation had similar overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.69, 95% confidence interval = 0.37-1.30), distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.92, 95% confidence interval = 0.53-1.60) and relapse-free survival (risk ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval = 0.69-1.55) compared to whole-neck irradiation. No differences in both acute and late toxicities were recorded between upper-neck irradiation and whole-neck irradiation.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis supports the potential role of upper-neck irradiation in this population of patients. Further research is needed to confirm results.