From the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Programme and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (N.I.P., C.C., C.S., P.P.), National University Hospital (K.L.C.), and Singapore Clinical Research Institute (Q.L., S.L.L., Y.P.) - all in Singapore; the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, and Persahabatan General Hospital, Jakarta (E.B.), Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya (T.K.), Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung (R.R.), Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar (I.D.), and Saiful Anwar Hospital, Malang (J.J.R.S.) - all in Indonesia; De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute, Cavite (V.B.D.), the Lung Centre of the Philippines, Quezon City (V.M.B.), and the Tropical Disease Foundation, Makati (R.S.V.) - all in the Philippines; the Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda (C.S.-W.); HIV-NAT, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Center and Center of Excellence in Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand (A.A.); the National Institute of TB and Respiratory Diseases, New Delhi, India (R.S.); and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (N.I.P.) and the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (N.I.P., A.J.N., A.M.C.) - both in London.
N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 9;388(10):873-887. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212537. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
Tuberculosis is usually treated with a 6-month rifampin-based regimen. Whether a strategy involving shorter initial treatment may lead to similar outcomes is unclear.
In this adaptive, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned participants with rifampin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis to undergo either standard treatment (rifampin and isoniazid for 24 weeks with pyrazinamide and ethambutol for the first 8 weeks) or a strategy involving initial treatment with an 8-week regimen, extended treatment for persistent clinical disease, monitoring after treatment, and retreatment for relapse. There were four strategy groups with different initial regimens; noninferiority was assessed in the two strategy groups with complete enrollment, which had initial regimens of high-dose rifampin-linezolid and bedaquiline-linezolid (each with isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol). The primary outcome was a composite of death, ongoing treatment, or active disease at week 96. The noninferiority margin was 12 percentage points.
Of the 674 participants in the intention-to-treat population, 4 (0.6%) withdrew consent or were lost to follow-up. A primary-outcome event occurred in 7 of the 181 participants (3.9%) in the standard-treatment group, as compared with 21 of the 184 participants (11.4%) in the strategy group with an initial rifampin-linezolid regimen (adjusted difference, 7.4 percentage points; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 13.2; noninferiority not met) and 11 of the 189 participants (5.8%) in the strategy group with an initial bedaquiline-linezolid regimen (adjusted difference, 0.8 percentage points; 97.5% CI, -3.4 to 5.1; noninferiority met). The mean total duration of treatment was 180 days in the standard-treatment group, 106 days in the rifampin-linezolid strategy group, and 85 days in the bedaquiline-linezolid strategy group. The incidences of grade 3 or 4 adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in the three groups.
A strategy involving initial treatment with an 8-week bedaquiline-linezolid regimen was noninferior to standard treatment for tuberculosis with respect to clinical outcomes. The strategy was associated with a shorter total duration of treatment and with no evident safety concerns. (Funded by the Singapore National Medical Research Council and others; TRUNCATE-TB ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03474198.).
结核病通常采用 6 个月利福平为基础的方案进行治疗。初始治疗时间较短的策略是否可能导致相似的结果尚不清楚。
在这项适应性、开放性、非劣效性试验中,我们将耐利福平的肺结核患者随机分为标准治疗组(利福平加异烟肼治疗 24 周,前 8 周加用吡嗪酰胺和乙胺丁醇)或初始治疗 8 周的策略组,持续临床疾病的延长治疗、治疗后监测和复发后的再治疗。有四个具有不同初始方案的策略组;在完成入组的两个策略组中评估非劣效性,其初始方案为高剂量利福平-利奈唑胺和贝达喹啉-利奈唑胺(均含异烟肼、吡嗪酰胺和乙胺丁醇)。主要结局是第 96 周时死亡、持续治疗或活动性疾病的复合结局。非劣效性边界为 12 个百分点。
在意向治疗人群的 674 名参与者中,有 4 名(0.6%)撤回了同意或失访。标准治疗组 181 名参与者中有 7 名(3.9%)发生了主要结局事件,而初始利福平-利奈唑胺方案组 184 名参与者中有 21 名(11.4%)(校正差异,7.4 个百分点;97.5%置信区间[CI],1.7 至 13.2;非劣效性未达到),初始贝达喹啉-利奈唑胺方案组 189 名参与者中有 11 名(5.8%)(校正差异,0.8 个百分点;97.5%CI,-3.4 至 5.1;达到非劣效性)。标准治疗组的平均总治疗时间为 180 天,利福平-利奈唑胺方案组为 106 天,贝达喹啉-利奈唑胺方案组为 85 天。三组的 3 级或 4 级不良事件和严重不良事件发生率相似。
对于结核病,采用 8 周贝达喹啉-利奈唑胺初始治疗的策略在临床结局方面不劣于标准治疗。该策略与较短的总治疗时间相关,且无明显安全性问题。(由新加坡国家医学研究理事会等资助;TRUNCATE-TB ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT03474198。)