Political Economy, King's College London, London, UK
Philosophy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 21;50(7):501-510. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108736.
This paper combines considerations from ethics, medicine and public health policy to articulate and defend a systematic case for mask wearing mandates (MWM). The paper argues for two main claims of general interest in favour of MWM. First, MWM provide a more effective, just and fair way to tackle the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic than policy alternatives such as laissez-faire approaches, mask wearing recommendations and physical distancing measures. And second, the proffered objections against MWM may justify some exemptions for specific categories of individuals, but do not cast doubt on the justifiability of these mandates. Hence, unless some novel decisive objections are put forward against MWM, governments should adopt MWM.
本文综合考虑了伦理学、医学和公共卫生政策,系统地提出并捍卫了口罩强制令(MWM)的合理性。本文主张口罩强制令具有两个主要的普遍利益,支持其实施。首先,与自由放任的方法、佩戴口罩的建议和保持身体距离等替代政策相比,MWM 是一种更有效、更公正、更公平的应对持续的 COVID-19 大流行的手段。其次,提出的反对 MWM 的理由可能为特定类别的个人提供一些豁免,但并不怀疑这些强制令的合理性。因此,除非针对 MWM 提出新的决定性反对意见,否则政府应采取 MWM。