Suppr超能文献

快速平衡透析、超滤还是超速离心?评估定量血浆中物质未结合分数的方法。

Rapid equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration or ultracentrifugation? Evaluation of methods to quantify the unbound fraction of substances in plasma.

机构信息

Free University of Berlin, Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Königin-Luise-Straße 2-4, 14195, Berlin, Germany.

BASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Carl-Bosch-Straße 38, 67063, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.

出版信息

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2023 Apr 9;651:114-120. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.02.021. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

Abstract

In pharmacokinetics plasma protein binding (PPB) is a well-established parameter impacting drug disposition. The unbound fraction (f) is arguably regarded the effective concentration at the target site. Pharmacology and toxicology, increasingly use in vitro models. The translation of in vitro concentrations to in vivo doses can be supported by toxicokinetic modelling, e.g. physiologically based toxicokinetic models (PBTK). PPB of a test substance is an input parameter for PBTK. We compared three methods to quantify f: rapid equilibrium dialysis (RED), ultrafiltration (UF) and ultracentrifugation (UC) using twelve substances covering a wide range of Log P (-0.1 to 6.8) and molecular weights (151 and 531 g/mol): Acetaminophen, Bisphenol A, Caffeine, Colchicine, Fenarimol, Flutamide, Genistein, Ketoconazole, α-Methyltestosterone, Tamoxifen, Trenbolone and Warfarin. After RED and UF separation, three polar substances (Log P < 2) were largely unbound (f > 70%), while more lipophilic substances were largely bound (f < 33%). Compared to RED or UF, UC resulted in a generally higher f of lipophilic substances. f obtained after RED and UF were more consistent with published data. For half of the substances, UC resulted in f higher than the reference data. UF, RED and both UF and UC, resulted in lower f of Flutamide, Ketoconazole and Colchicine, respectively. For f quantifications, the separation method should be selected according to the test substance's properties. Based on our data, RED is suitable for a broader range of substances while UC and UF are suitable for polar substances.

摘要

在药代动力学中,血浆蛋白结合(PPB)是一个既定的影响药物分布的参数。未结合部分(f)可被视为靶部位的有效浓度。药理学和毒理学越来越多地使用体外模型。通过毒代动力学建模(例如基于生理学的毒代动力学模型(PBTK))可以将体外浓度转化为体内剂量。测试物质的 PPB 是 PBTK 的输入参数。我们比较了三种方法来定量 f:快速平衡透析(RED)、超滤(UF)和超速离心(UC),使用了十二种涵盖广泛 Log P(-0.1 至 6.8)和分子量(151 和 531 g/mol)的物质:对乙酰氨基酚、双酚 A、咖啡因、秋水仙碱、芬那醇、氟他胺、染料木黄酮、酮康唑、α-甲基睾酮、他莫昔芬、群勃龙和华法林。在 RED 和 UF 分离后,三种极性物质(Log P < 2)的未结合部分(f > 70%)很大,而疏水性物质的结合部分(f < 33%)很大。与 RED 或 UF 相比,UC 通常导致疏水性物质的 f 更高。RED 和 UF 获得的 f 与已发表的数据更一致。对于一半的物质,UC 导致的 f 高于参考数据。UF、RED 和 UF 和 UC 分别导致氟他胺、酮康唑和秋水仙碱的 f 降低。对于 f 的定量,分离方法应根据测试物质的性质选择。根据我们的数据,RED 适用于更广泛的物质范围,而 UC 和 UF 适用于极性物质。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验