Suppr超能文献

精神健康消费者对其身体健康看法的研究述评:在这项研究的设计、实施、分析和报告中是否没有考虑到消费者的意见?

A critical review of research into mental health consumers' perspectives on their physical health: Is there an absence of consumers in the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of this research?

机构信息

School of Law, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Psychology and Social Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 6;10:982339. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.982339. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

We conducted a critical review, using systematic methods, of the literature examining mental health consumer perspectives on their physical and mental health in academic research published between 2005 and 2021. This review examined the inclusion, extent, type and centrality of consumer perspectives regarding their mental and physical health. The search produced 1,865 papers from which 116 met the inclusion criteria. Studies predominantly focused on consumers' individual experiences of their physical and mental health, including but not limited to their understandings and experiences of medication and associated risk factors. They also captured some social aspects of mental health consumers' physical health, including factors that impacted individual agency, stigma, and social and interpersonal factors. Structural factors affecting physical and mental health, such as accessibility of services and financial constraints, were also identified. The review revealed that in comparison to clinician perspectives, the direct representation of consumer perspectives was lacking. Similarly, while clinician and carer perspectives on structural factors were investigated, the consumer perspective in this area was missing. The review also found few genuine codesigned or coproduced research studies. To better identify and respond to the health needs as prioritized by consumers, this paper argues it is imperative that future studies prioritize codesigned and coproduced research. It is argued that a focus on "services as provided" rather than "services as received" has contributed to a lack of progress in addressing the life expectancy gap for consumers. It is recommended that journals, ethics committees and research policy organizations develop guidelines and standards to inform best practice in research on consumer perspectives and experience and to support the implementation of codesigned and/or coproduced approaches in future research. Respecting and including consumers as equal partners in the research process will lead to more meaningful insights to inform policy and practice and reduce the life expectancy gap for people living with mental health concerns.

摘要

我们采用系统方法,对 2005 年至 2021 年期间发表的学术研究中关于心理健康消费者对其身心健康观点的文献进行了批判性回顾。本综述考察了消费者对其心理和身体健康的观点的包容性、程度、类型和中心性。该搜索从 1,865 篇论文中筛选出 116 篇符合纳入标准的论文。这些研究主要关注消费者对其身心健康的个体体验,包括但不限于他们对药物及其相关风险因素的理解和体验。它们还捕捉到了心理健康消费者身体健康的一些社会方面,包括影响个体能动性、污名化以及社会和人际关系因素的因素。还确定了影响身心健康的结构因素,如服务的可及性和财务限制。本综述表明,与临床医生的观点相比,消费者观点的直接代表性不足。同样,虽然对临床医生和照顾者关于结构因素的观点进行了调查,但在这一领域缺乏消费者观点。该综述还发现很少有真正的共同设计或共同制作的研究。为了更好地确定和满足消费者优先考虑的健康需求,本文认为未来的研究必须优先考虑共同设计和共同制作的研究。有人认为,关注“提供的服务”而不是“接受的服务”,是导致解决消费者预期寿命差距方面缺乏进展的原因之一。建议期刊、伦理委员会和研究政策组织制定指南和标准,为消费者观点和经验研究提供最佳实践,并支持在未来研究中采用共同设计和/或共同制作的方法。尊重和将消费者视为研究过程中的平等合作伙伴,将为更有意义的见解提供信息,以告知政策和实践,并缩小有心理健康问题的人的预期寿命差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da1f/9939465/eecaaf3207da/fpubh-10-982339-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验