Damaskos Christos, Garmpis Nikolaos, Psilopatis Iason, Dimitroulis Dimitrios
Renal Transplantation Unit, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
N.S. Christeas Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Maedica (Bucur). 2022 Dec;17(4):939-947. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.4.939.
To date, the Clavien-Dindo classification system represents the most popular assessment tool of postoperative events that ranks surgical complications by the extent of respective required therapeutic interventions. This uniform grading system allows for an objective evaluation of outcomes from a surgical procedure by accurately and standardly defining surgical complications. However, many scientists have meanwhile heavily criticized the Clavien-Dindo classification system as an overly generalized and conservative grading system that requires modification. Herein, we aim to explain the need for reconsideration of the Clavien-Dindo classification system, and discuss the features of an ideal system for the classification of complications that should evaluate not only surgical complications, but also the risk and patient's general performance status.
迄今为止,Clavien-Dindo分类系统是最常用的术后事件评估工具,它根据各自所需治疗干预的程度对手术并发症进行分级。这种统一的分级系统通过准确、标准地定义手术并发症,对外科手术的结果进行客观评估。然而,与此同时,许多科学家严厉批评Clavien-Dindo分类系统过于笼统和保守,需要修改。在此,我们旨在解释重新考虑Clavien-Dindo分类系统的必要性,并讨论理想的并发症分类系统的特点,该系统不仅应评估手术并发症,还应评估风险和患者的一般表现状态。