Gatti Milo, Viaggi Bruno, Rossolini Gian Maria, Pea Federico, Viale Pierluigi
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 3;11(2):394. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020394.
(1) Introduction: To develop evidence-based algorithms for targeted antibiotic therapy of infections caused by in critically ill adult patients. (2) Methods: A multidisciplinary team of four experts had several rounds of assessment for developing algorithms concerning targeted antimicrobial therapy of severe infections caused by in critically ill patients. The literature search was performed by a researcher on PubMed-MEDLINE (until August 2022) to provide evidence for supporting therapeutic choices. Quality and strength of evidence was established according to a hierarchical scale of the study design. Two different algorithms were created, one for methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and the other for methicillin-resistant (MRSA). The therapeutic options were categorized for each different site of infection and were selected also on the basis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features. (3) Results: Cefazolin or oxacillin were the agents proposed for all of the different types of severe MSSA infections. The proposed targeted therapies for severe MRSA infections were different according to the infection site: daptomycin plus fosfomycin or ceftaroline or ceftobiprole for bloodstream infections, infective endocarditis, and/or infections associated with intracardiac/intravascular devices; ceftaroline or ceftobiprole for community-acquired pneumonia; linezolid alone or plus fosfomycin for infection-related ventilator-associated complications or for central nervous system infections; daptomycin alone or plus clindamycin for necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections. (4) Conclusions: We are confident that targeted therapies based on scientific evidence and optimization of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features of antibiotic monotherapy or combo therapy may represent valuable strategies for treating MSSA and MRSA infections.
(1) 引言:为重症成年患者由[具体病菌名称未给出]引起的感染制定基于证据的靶向抗生素治疗算法。(2) 方法:一个由四名专家组成的多学科团队对制定重症患者由[具体病菌名称未给出]引起的严重感染的靶向抗菌治疗算法进行了多轮评估。由一名研究人员在PubMed - MEDLINE上进行文献检索(截至2022年8月),以提供支持治疗选择的证据。根据研究设计的分级量表确定证据的质量和强度。创建了两种不同的算法,一种用于甲氧西林敏感[具体病菌名称未给出](MSSA),另一种用于耐甲氧西林[具体病菌名称未给出](MRSA)。针对每种不同的感染部位对治疗方案进行分类,并且还根据药代动力学/药效学特征进行选择。(3) 结果:头孢唑林或苯唑西林是针对所有不同类型严重MSSA感染建议使用的药物。针对严重MRSA感染的建议靶向治疗根据感染部位而有所不同:对于血流感染、感染性心内膜炎和/或与心内/血管内装置相关的感染,使用达托霉素加磷霉素或头孢洛林或头孢托罗;对于社区获得性肺炎,使用头孢洛林或头孢托罗;对于与感染相关的呼吸机相关性并发症或中枢神经系统感染,单独使用利奈唑胺或加用磷霉素;对于坏死性皮肤和软组织感染,单独使用达托霉素或加用克林霉素。(4) 结论:我们相信,基于科学证据以及优化抗生素单药治疗或联合治疗的药代动力学/药效学特征的靶向治疗可能是治疗MSSA和MRSA感染的有价值策略。