Lee Su Vin, Aplin Tammy, Sefidani Forough Aida, Steadman Kathryn J
School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 3;15(2):517. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020517.
Tablet crushing is a common practice used by patients and their carers, mainly to facilitate swallowing. Various tablet-crushing devices with different designs are currently available on the market. This study aimed to compare the usability of different tablet-crushing devices in people with and without limited hand functions. The hand function of 100 adults recruited from the general community (40 of whom self-reported a limited hand function) was assessed using the hand and finger function subscale of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale version 2. The hand strength was measured using a dynamometer. Participants crushed tablets using 11 crushing devices and completed a Rapid Assessment of Product Usability and Universal Design questionnaire for each device. Hand-held twist-action crushers with an ergonomic grip received the highest usability scores among both groups, irrespective of the cost ( < 0.05). Crushers with bags were scored lower by those with limited hand functions, although the score improved if the device was automatic. Preferences regarding electronic crushers significantly changed once the cost was revealed. Economical twist-action crushers with ergonomic grips and without bags or cups were the most favoured crushers.
压片是患者及其护理人员常用的一种做法,主要是为了便于吞咽。目前市场上有各种设计不同的压片装置。本研究旨在比较不同压片装置在手部功能受限和不受限人群中的可用性。从普通社区招募了100名成年人(其中40人自述手部功能受限),使用关节炎影响测量量表第2版的手部和手指功能子量表评估其手部功能。使用测力计测量握力。参与者使用11种压片装置压片,并针对每种装置完成一份产品可用性和通用设计快速评估问卷。无论成本如何,具有符合人体工程学握把的手持式旋转式压片器在两组中获得的可用性评分最高(<0.05)。对于手部功能受限的人来说,带袋的压片器得分较低,不过如果该装置是自动的,得分会有所提高。一旦公布成本,对电动压片器的偏好就会显著改变。最受青睐的压片器是经济实惠的、带有符合人体工程学握把且没有袋子或杯子的旋转式压片器。