Department of Population Health, Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy (COEP), NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Population Health, Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy (COEP), NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Mar;8(3):e238-e246. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00023-3.
As the USA faces a worsening overdose crisis, improving access to evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a policy priority. Federal regulatory changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic substantially expanded flexibilities on take-home doses for methadone treatment for OUD. These changes have fuelled questions about the effect of new regulations on OUD outcomes and the potential effect on health of permanently integrating these flexibilities into treatment policy going forward. To aide US policy makers as they consider implementing permanent methadone regulatory changes, we conducted a review synthesising peer-reviewed research on the effect of the flexibilities of methadone take-home policies introduced during COVID-19 on methadone programme operations, OUD patient and provider experiences, and patient health outcomes. We interpret the findings in the context of the federal rule-making process and discuss avenues by which these findings can be incorporated and implemented into US policies on substance use treatment going forward.
随着美国面临日益恶化的药物过量危机,改善阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的循证治疗的可及性仍然是一个政策优先事项。为应对 COVID-19 大流行而进行的联邦法规改革,大幅扩大了美沙酮治疗 OUD 的口服剂量的灵活性。这些变化引发了人们对新法规对 OUD 结果的影响以及将这些灵活性永久纳入未来治疗政策对健康的潜在影响的质疑。为了帮助美国政策制定者在考虑实施永久性美沙酮法规改革时,我们进行了一项审查,综合了同行评议的研究,这些研究探讨了在 COVID-19 期间引入的美沙酮口服政策的灵活性对美沙酮项目运营、OUD 患者和提供者体验以及患者健康结果的影响。我们根据联邦规则制定过程来解释这些发现,并讨论了将这些发现纳入和实施到美国未来的物质使用治疗政策的途径。