The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Jefferson Medical Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Clin Cardiol. 2023 May;46(5):477-483. doi: 10.1002/clc.23995. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
We compared diagnostic performance, costs, and association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) of clinical coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) interpretation versus semiautomated approach that use artificial intelligence and machine learning for atherosclerosis imaging-quantitative computed tomography (AI-QCT) for patients being referred for nonemergent invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
CCTA data from individuals enrolled into the randomized controlled Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization trial for an American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guideline indication for ICA were analyzed. Site interpretation of CCTAs were compared to those analyzed by a cloud-based software (Cleerly, Inc.) that performs AI-QCT for stenosis determination, coronary vascular measurements and quantification and characterization of atherosclerotic plaque. CCTA interpretation and AI-QCT guided findings were related to MACE at 1-year follow-up.
Seven hundred forty-seven stable patients (60 ± 12.2 years, 49% women) were included. Using AI-QCT, 9% of patients had no CAD compared with 34% for clinical CCTA interpretation. Application of AI-QCT to identify obstructive coronary stenosis at the ≥50% and ≥70% threshold would have reduced ICA by 87% and 95%, respectively. Clinical outcomes for patients without AI-QCT-identified obstructive stenosis was excellent; for 78% of patients with maximum stenosis < 50%, no cardiovascular death or acute myocardial infarction occurred. When applying an AI-QCT referral management approach to avoid ICA in patients with <50% or <70% stenosis, overall costs were reduced by 26% and 34%, respectively.
In stable patients referred for ACC/AHA guideline-indicated nonemergent ICA, application of artificial intelligence and machine learning for AI-QCT can significantly reduce ICA rates and costs with no change in 1-year MACE.
我们比较了临床冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)解读与基于人工智能和机器学习的半自动化方法(用于动脉粥样硬化成像定量计算机断层扫描(AI-QCT))在为非紧急性侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)就诊的患者中的诊断性能、成本和与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的相关性。
分析了参加随机对照计算机断层血管造影选择性导管插入术试验的个体的 CCTA 数据,该试验是根据美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)指南对 ICA 的适应证进行的。比较了 CCTA 的站点解读与基于云端软件(Cleerly,Inc.)的解读,该软件可用于 AI-QCT 以确定狭窄程度、冠状动脉血管测量和定量以及动脉粥样硬化斑块的特征。CCTA 解读和 AI-QCT 指导的发现与 1 年随访时的 MACE 相关。
共纳入 747 例稳定患者(60±12.2 岁,49%为女性)。使用 AI-QCT,9%的患者无 CAD,而临床 CCTA 解读为 34%。应用 AI-QCT 以确定≥50%和≥70%狭窄阈值的阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄可分别减少 87%和 95%的 ICA。AI-QCT 未识别出阻塞性狭窄的患者临床结局良好;对于最大狭窄<50%的 78%患者,未发生心血管死亡或急性心肌梗死。当应用 AI-QCT 转诊管理方法避免狭窄<50%或<70%的患者进行 ICA 时,总成本分别降低了 26%和 34%。
在接受 ACC/AHA 指南推荐的非紧急性 ICA 就诊的稳定患者中,应用人工智能和机器学习进行 AI-QCT 可显著降低 ICA 率和成本,1 年 MACE 无变化。