Suppr超能文献

组织粘合剂胶水与皮下可吸收缝线在甲状腺手术后皮肤缝合中的比较:一项单盲随机对照试验。

Comparison of Tissue Adhesive Glue with Subcuticular Absorbable Suture for Skin Closure Following Thyroid Surgery: A single-blinded randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.

Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India.

出版信息

Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2023 Feb;23(1):42-47. doi: 10.18295/squmj.1.2022.005. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the skin closure time, postoperative pain and the scar outcome between tissue adhesive and sub-cuticular sutures in thyroid surgery.

METHODS

This study was conducted in Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, a tertiary care hospital in India from March 2017 to December 2019. Adult patients undergoing thyroid surgery were included while those with previous neck surgery, history of keloids/hypertrophic scars and those undergoing concomitant neck dissections were excluded. Following platysma closure, patients were randomised into two groups (tissue adhesive and subcuticular sutures) using the Serially Numbered Opaque Sealed Envelopes technique. A sample size of 64 in each group was calculated for this prospective, single-blinded and randomised controlled trial. The primary outcome was the skin closure time. The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain at 24 hours and scar scoring at 1 and 3 postoperative month. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software.

RESULTS

A total sample of 124 patients were included in this study, with 61 patients assigned to the suture group and 63 assigned to the tissue adhesive group. The median skin closure time and postoperative pain was significantly lower in the tissue adhesive group as compared to the suture group ( <0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in scar outcome at the 1 or 3 months between both groups ( = 0.088 and 0.137, respectively). There were no wound-related complications in either group. When a subgroup analysis was conducted, no difference was seen in the scar outcome or wound-related complications in patients with comorbidities. There were no instances of allergic contact dermatitis to the tissue adhesive.

CONCLUSION

The use of tissue adhesive leads to lower operative time and less postoperative pain in thyroid surgeries. The scar outcome is comparable between tissue adhesives and subcuticular sutures.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较组织粘合剂与皮内缝合在甲状腺手术中对皮肤缝合时间、术后疼痛和疤痕结局的影响。

方法

本研究于 2017 年 3 月至 2019 年 12 月在印度的贾瓦哈拉尔尼赫鲁医学研究所(JIPMER)进行,该研究所是一家三级保健医院。纳入接受甲状腺手术的成年患者,排除既往颈部手术史、瘢痕疙瘩/增生性瘢痕史和同时行颈部清扫术的患者。颈阔肌关闭后,采用连续编号不透明密封信封技术将患者随机分为两组(组织粘合剂组和皮内缝合组)。每组计算了 64 例的样本量,这是一项前瞻性、单盲和随机对照试验。主要结局是皮肤缝合时间。次要结局是术后 24 小时疼痛和术后 1 个月和 3 个月的疤痕评分。统计分析采用 SPSS 软件进行。

结果

本研究共纳入 124 例患者,其中 61 例患者分配至缝合组,63 例患者分配至组织粘合剂组。与缝合组相比,组织粘合剂组的皮肤缝合时间和术后疼痛的中位数明显较低(<0.01)。两组在 1 个月和 3 个月时的疤痕结局均无统计学差异(分别为 = 0.088 和 0.137)。两组均无与伤口相关的并发症。当进行亚组分析时,在伴有合并症的患者中,疤痕结局或与伤口相关的并发症无差异。无组织粘合剂过敏接触性皮炎的病例。

结论

在甲状腺手术中使用组织粘合剂可缩短手术时间并减轻术后疼痛。组织粘合剂和皮内缝合的疤痕结局相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370e/9974034/d8bb04b6067f/squmj2302-42-47f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验