Wu Jianxin, Zhan Xiaoling, Xu Hui, Ma Chunbo
School of Economics, Institute of Resource, Environment and Sustainable Development Research, Jinan University, No.601 Huangpu West Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, PR. China.
School of Economics, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Rd, Nankai District, PR. China.
Struct Chang Econ Dyn. 2023 Jun;65:151-165. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
As the first major developing country heavily struck by the COVID-19 pandemic, China adopted the world's most stringent lockdown interventions to contain the virus spread. Using macro- and micro-level data, this paper shows that both the pandemic and lockdown policies have had negative and significant impacts on the economy. Gross regional product (GRP) fell by 9.5 and 0.3 percentage points in cities with and without lockdown interventions, respectively. These impacts represent a dramatic recession from China's average growth of 6.74% before the pandemic. The results indicate that lockdown explains 2.8 percentage points of the GDP loss. We also document significant spill-over effects of the pandemic in adjacent areas but no such effects of lockdown. Reduced labor mobility, land supply, and entrepreneurship are among the most significant mechanisms underpinning the impacts of the pandemic and lockdown. Cities with higher share of secondary industry, higher traffic intensity, lower population density, lower internet access, and lower fiscal capacity suffered more. However, these cities seem to have recovered well from the recession and quickly closed the economic gap in the aftermath of the pandemic and city lockdown. Our findings have broader implications for the global interventions in pandemic containment.
作为首个受新冠疫情重创的主要发展中国家,中国采取了世界上最严格的封锁措施以遏制病毒传播。本文利用宏观和微观层面的数据表明,疫情和封锁政策均对经济产生了负面且显著的影响。在实施封锁措施的城市和未实施封锁措施的城市,地区生产总值(GRP)分别下降了9.5个百分点和0.3个百分点。这些影响与疫情前中国6.74%的平均增长率相比,是一次剧烈的衰退。结果表明,封锁导致了2.8个百分点的GDP损失。我们还记录了疫情在相邻地区的显著溢出效应,但封锁没有此类效应。劳动力流动性降低、土地供应减少和创业活动减少是支撑疫情和封锁影响的最重要机制。第二产业占比更高、交通流量更大、人口密度更低、互联网接入率更低以及财政能力更低的城市受影响更大。然而,这些城市似乎已从衰退中很好地恢复过来,并在疫情和城市封锁后迅速缩小了经济差距。我们的研究结果对全球疫情防控干预措施具有更广泛的意义。