Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Division of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sports Health. 2024 Jan-Feb;16(1):79-88. doi: 10.1177/19417381231152448. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
While concussions are common pediatric injuries, a lack of agreement on a standard definition of recovery creates multiple challenges for clinicians and researchers alike.
The percentage of concussed youth deemed recovered as part of a prospective cohort study will differ depending on the recovery definition.
Descriptive epidemiologic study of a prospectively enrolled observational cohort.
Level 3.
Participants aged 11 to 18 years were enrolled from the concussion program of a tertiary care academic center. Data were collected from initial and follow-up clinical visits ≤12 weeks from injury. A total of 10 recovery definitions were assessed: (1) cleared to full return to sports; (2) return to full school; (3) self-reported return to normal; (4) self-reported full return to school; (5) self-reported full return to exercise; (6) symptom return to preinjury state; (7) complete symptom resolution; (8) symptoms below standardized threshold; (9) no abnormal visio-vestibular examination (VVE) elements; and (10) ≤1 abnormal VVE assessments.
In total, 174 participants were enrolled. By week 4, 63.8% met at least 1 recovery definition versus 78.2% by week 8 versus 88.5% by week 12. For individual measures of recovery at week 4, percent recovered ranged from 5% by self-reported full return to exercise to 45% for ≤1 VVE abnormality (similar trends at 8 and 12 weeks).
There is wide variability in the proportion of youth considered recovered at various points following concussion depending on the definition of recovery, with higher proportions using physiologic examination-based measures and lower proportions using patient-reported measures.
These results further emphasize the need for a multimodal assessment of recovery by clinicians as a single and standardized definition of recovery that captures the broad impact of concussion on a given patient continues to be elusive.
虽然脑震荡是常见的儿科损伤,但由于缺乏对恢复标准定义的共识,给临床医生和研究人员都带来了诸多挑战。
在一项前瞻性队列研究中,被认为是康复的脑震荡青少年的比例将因恢复定义而异。
对一个前瞻性纳入的观察队列进行描述性流行病学研究。
3 级。
参与者年龄在 11 至 18 岁,从三级护理学术中心的脑震荡项目中招募。数据收集自受伤后≤12 周的初始和随访临床就诊。评估了总共 10 种恢复定义:(1)清除后可完全恢复运动;(2)恢复正常学业;(3)自我报告恢复正常;(4)自我报告完全恢复学业;(5)自我报告完全恢复运动;(6)症状恢复到受伤前状态;(7)完全症状缓解;(8)症状低于标准化阈值;(9)无异常视动平衡检查(VVE)结果;(10)≤1 次异常 VVE 评估。
共有 174 名参与者入组。第 4 周时,63.8%符合至少 1 种恢复定义,第 8 周时为 78.2%,第 12 周时为 88.5%。在第 4 周的个别恢复测量中,恢复比例范围从自我报告的完全恢复运动的 5%到≤1 次 VVE 异常的 45%(第 8 和 12 周有类似的趋势)。
根据恢复的定义,在脑震荡后不同时间点,被认为是康复的青少年的比例差异很大,使用基于生理检查的指标的比例较高,使用患者报告的指标的比例较低。
这些结果进一步强调了临床医生需要对恢复进行多模式评估,因为单一且标准化的恢复定义,仍难以捕捉脑震荡对特定患者的广泛影响。