Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4122, Australia.
Suicide Research Centre, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, LT-03100 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3816. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053816.
Two studies are reported that extend the evidence base for use of the Personal Stigma of Suicide Questionnaire (PSSQ). In the first study (N = 117), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, the WHO-5 measure of well-being, as well as measures of suicidality were examined in relation to the PSSQ. A self-selected sub-sample (N = 30) completed the PSSQ after an interval of two months. In line with the stigma internalization model, when demographic variables and suicidality were accounted for, the PSSQ self-blame subscale was the most significant predictor of self-esteem. As for well-being, the rejection subscale was involved as well as self-blame. The retest stability of the PSSQ for the sub-sample was 0.85 and coefficient alpha for the total sample was 0.95, indicating both good stability and internal consistency for the scale. In the second study (N = 140), PSSQ was studied in relation to intention to seek help from four sources in the case of suicidal ideation. The strongest relationship with PSSQ was with intention not to seek help from anyone (r = 0.35). When other variables were included in the prediction of help-seeking from a general medical practitioner, family or friends, or from nobody, the only significant PSSQ correlate was minimization. For help-seeking from a psychologist or psychiatrist, the most significant predictor was judged helpfulness of prior contact with them. The results from these studies strengthen previous findings of the construct validity of the PSSQ and point to its utility in understanding barriers to help-seeking among those experiencing suicidality.
报告了两项研究,这些研究扩展了使用自杀个人耻辱感问卷(PSSQ)的证据基础。在第一项研究中(N=117),在与 PSSQ 相关的情况下,检验了罗森伯格自尊量表、世界卫生组织幸福感量表(WHO-5)以及自杀量表。一个自我选择的子样本(N=30)在两个月的间隔后完成了 PSSQ。与耻辱内化模型一致,当考虑人口统计学变量和自杀倾向时,PSSQ 的自责子量表是自尊的最显著预测因子。至于幸福感,涉及排斥子量表以及自责。子样本的 PSSQ 重测稳定性为 0.85,总样本的系数α为 0.95,表明该量表具有良好的稳定性和内部一致性。在第二项研究中(N=140),研究了 PSSQ 与在有自杀意念的情况下从四个来源寻求帮助的意图之间的关系。与 PSSQ 关系最强的是不打算向任何人寻求帮助的意图(r=0.35)。当在预测向一般医生、家人或朋友或无人寻求帮助时纳入其他变量时,唯一具有显著意义的 PSSQ 相关因素是最小化。对于向心理学家或精神科医生寻求帮助,最显著的预测因素是对他们先前接触的有用性的判断。这些研究的结果加强了 PSSQ 的结构有效性的先前发现,并指出它在理解有自杀倾向的人寻求帮助的障碍方面的实用性。