School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University, Richcraft Hall, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 22;23(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15373-9.
The increased scrutiny on public health brought upon by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic provides a strong impetus for a renewal of public health systems. This paper seeks to understand priorities of public health decision-makers for reforms to public health financing, organization, interventions, and workforce.
We used an online 3-round real-time Delphi method of reaching consensus on priorities for public health systems reform. Participants were recruited among individuals holding senior roles in Canadian public health institutions, ministries of health and regional health authorities. In Round 1, participants were asked to rate 9 propositions related to public health financing, organization, workforce, and interventions. Participants were also asked to contribute up to three further ideas in relation to these topics in open-ended format. In Rounds 2 and 3, participants re-appraised their ratings in the view of the group's ratings in the previous round.
Eighty-six public health senior decision-makers from various public health organizations across Canada were invited to participate. Of these, 25/86 completed Round 1 (29% response rate), 19/25 completed Round 2 (76% retention rate) and 18/19 completed Round 3 (95% retention rate). Consensus (defined as more than 70% of importance rating) was achieved for 6 out of 9 propositions at the end of the third round. In only one case, the consensus was that the proposition was not important. Proposition rated consensually important relate to targeted public health budget, time frame for spending this budget, and the specialization of public health structures. Both interventions related and not related to the COVID-19 pandemic were judged important. Open-ended comments further highlighted priorities for renewal in public health governance and public health information management systems.
Consensus emerged rapidly among Canadian public health decision-makers on prioritizing public health budget and time frame for spending. Ensuring that public health services beyond COVID-19 and communicable disease are maintained and enhanced is also of central importance. Future research shall explore potential trade-offs between these priorities.
持续的 COVID-19 大流行对公共卫生的严格审查为公共卫生系统的更新提供了强大的动力。本文旨在了解公共卫生决策者在公共卫生融资、组织、干预和劳动力方面改革的优先事项。
我们使用了一种在线的三轮实时德尔菲法来就公共卫生系统改革的优先事项达成共识。参与者是在加拿大公共卫生机构、卫生部和地区卫生局担任高级职务的个人中招募的。在第一轮中,参与者被要求对与公共卫生融资、组织、劳动力和干预相关的 9 项提议进行评分。参与者还被要求以开放式格式就这些主题提出最多三个其他想法。在第二轮和第三轮中,参与者根据前一轮的小组评分重新评估他们的评分。
邀请了来自加拿大各地各种公共卫生组织的 86 名公共卫生高级决策者参与。其中,25/86 人完成了第一轮(29%的回复率),25/25 人完成了第二轮(76%的保留率),18/19 人完成了第三轮(95%的保留率)。在第三轮结束时,有 6 项提议达成了共识(定义为重要性评分超过 70%)。只有一项提议的共识是不重要的。被评为一致重要的提议与有针对性的公共卫生预算、花费这笔预算的时间框架以及公共卫生结构的专业化有关。与 COVID-19 大流行相关和不相关的干预措施都被认为是重要的。开放式评论进一步强调了公共卫生治理和公共卫生信息管理系统更新的优先事项。
加拿大公共卫生决策者在优先考虑公共卫生预算和花费时间框架方面迅速达成共识。确保除 COVID-19 和传染病之外的公共卫生服务得到维持和加强也至关重要。未来的研究将探讨这些优先事项之间的潜在权衡。