Suppr超能文献

2010年至2018年78个国家国家艾滋病毒/艾滋病支出的技术效率:数据包络分析

Technical efficiency of national HIV/AIDS spending in 78 countries between 2010 and 2018: A data envelopment analysis.

作者信息

Allel Kasim, Abou Jaoude Gerard Joseph, Birungi Charles, Palmer Tom, Skordis Jolene, Haghparast-Bidgoli Hassan

机构信息

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

United Nations Joint Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS), Harare, Zimbabwe.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;2(8):e0000463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000463. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

HIV/AIDS remains a leading global cause of disease burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In 2020, more than 80% of all people living with HIV (PLHIV) lived in LMICs. While progress has been made in extending coverage of HIV/AIDS services, only 66% of all PLHIV were virally suppressed at the end of 2020. In addition to more resources, the efficiency of spending is key to accelerating progress towards global 2030 targets for HIV/AIDs, including viral load suppression. This study aims to estimate the efficiency of HIV/AIDS spending across 78 countries. We employed a data envelopment analysis (DEA) and a truncated regression to estimate the technical efficiency of 78 countries, mostly low- and middle-income, in delivering HIV/AIDS services from 2010 to 2018. Publicly available data informed the model. We considered national HIV/AIDS spending as the DEA input, and prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) and antiretroviral treatment (ART) as outputs. The model was adjusted by independent variables to account for country characteristics and investigate associations with technical efficiency. On average, there has been substantial improvement in technical efficiency over time. Spending was converted into outputs almost twice as efficiently in 2018 (81.8%; 95% CI = 77.64, 85.99) compared with 2010 (47.5%; 95% CI = 43.4, 51.6). Average technical efficiency was 66.9% between 2010 and 2018, in other words 33.1% more outputs could have been produced relative to existing levels for the same amount of spending. There is also some variation between WHO/UNAIDS regions. European and Eastern and Southern Africa regions converted spending into outputs most efficiently between 2010 and 2018. Rule of Law, Gross National Income, Human Development Index, HIV prevalence and out-of-pocket expenditures were all significantly associated with efficiency scores. The technical efficiency of HIV investments has improved over time. However, there remains scope to substantially increase HIV/AIDS spending efficiency and improve progress towards 2030 global targets for HIV/AIDS. Given that many of the most efficient countries did not meet 2020 global HIV targets, our study supports the WHO call for additional investment in HIV/AIDS prevention and control to meet the 2030 HIV/AIDS and eradication of the AIDS epidemic.

摘要

艾滋病毒/艾滋病仍然是全球疾病负担的主要原因,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。2020年,超过80%的艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)生活在低收入和中等收入国家。虽然在扩大艾滋病毒/艾滋病服务覆盖范围方面取得了进展,但到2020年底,只有66%的艾滋病毒感染者实现了病毒抑制。除了更多资源外,支出效率是加快实现2030年全球艾滋病毒/艾滋病目标(包括病毒载量抑制)进展的关键。本研究旨在估计78个国家的艾滋病毒/艾滋病支出效率。我们采用数据包络分析(DEA)和截断回归来估计78个国家(大多为低收入和中等收入国家)在2010年至2018年提供艾滋病毒/艾滋病服务方面的技术效率。公开可用的数据为模型提供了信息。我们将国家艾滋病毒/艾滋病支出视为DEA投入,将预防母婴传播(PMTCT)和抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)视为产出。该模型通过自变量进行调整,以考虑国家特征并调查与技术效率的关联。随着时间的推移,技术效率总体上有了显著提高。与2010年(47.5%;95%置信区间=43.4,51.6)相比,2018年支出转化为产出的效率几乎提高了两倍(81.8%;95%置信区间=77.64,85.99)。2010年至2018年期间的平均技术效率为66.9%,换句话说,在相同支出水平下,相对于现有水平可以多产出33.1%。世卫组织/联合国艾滋病规划署各区域之间也存在一些差异。2010年至2018年期间,欧洲以及东部和南部非洲区域将支出转化为产出的效率最高。法治、国民总收入、人类发展指数、艾滋病毒流行率和自付费用均与效率得分显著相关。艾滋病毒投资的技术效率随着时间的推移有所提高。然而,仍有大幅提高艾滋病毒/艾滋病支出效率并加快实现2030年全球艾滋病毒/艾滋病目标进展的空间。鉴于许多效率最高的国家未达到2020年全球艾滋病毒目标,我们的研究支持世卫组织呼吁增加对艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防和控制的投资,以实现2030年艾滋病毒/艾滋病目标并消除艾滋病流行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca59/10022340/731bb0463c1f/pgph.0000463.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验