Suppr超能文献

肉类加工、农产品加工和农场工人中新冠病毒的血清流行率及风险因素

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and risk factors among meat packing, produce processing, and farm workers.

作者信息

Klein Melissa D, Sciaudone Michael, Richardson David, Lacayo Roberto, McClean Colleen M, Kharabora Oksana, Murray Katherine, Zivanovich Miriana Moreno, Strohminger Stephen, Gurnett Rachel, Markmann Alena J, Bhowmik D Ryan, Salgado Emperatriz Morales, Castro-Arroyo Edwin, Aiello Allison E, Boyce Ross M, Juliano Jonathan J, Bowman Natalie M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;2(7):e0000619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000619. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Meat packing, produce processing, and farm workers are known to have an elevated risk of COVID-19, but occupational risk factors in this population are unclear. We performed an observational cohort study of meat packing, produce processing, and farm workers in North Carolina in fall 2020. Blood, saliva, and nasal turbinate samples were collected to assess for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity were investigated using chi-square tests, two-sample t-tests, and adjusted risk ratio analyses. Among 118 enrolled workers, the baseline SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was 50.0%. Meat packing plant workers had the highest SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence (64.6%), followed by farm workers (45.0%) and produce processing workers (10.0%), despite similar sociodemographic characteristics. Compared to SARS-CoV-2 seronegative workers, seropositive workers were more likely to work in loud environments that necessitated yelling to communicate (RR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.25-2.69), work in cold environments (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.12-2.24), or continue working despite developing symptoms at work (RR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.14-2.32). After adjusting for age and working despite symptoms, high occupational noise levels were associated with a 1.72 times higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (95% CI: 1.16-2.55). Half of food processing workers showed evidence of past SARS-CoV-2 infection, a prevalence five times higher than most of the United States population at the time of the study. Work environments with loud ambient noise may pose elevated risks for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Our findings also highlight the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 among underserved and economically disadvantaged Latinx communities in the United States.

摘要

众所周知,肉类加工、农产品加工和农场工人感染新冠病毒的风险较高,但该人群的职业风险因素尚不清楚。2020年秋季,我们在北卡罗来纳州对肉类加工、农产品加工和农场工人进行了一项观察性队列研究。采集血液、唾液和鼻甲样本以评估新冠病毒血清阳性情况。使用卡方检验、两样本t检验和调整后的风险比分析来研究新冠病毒血清阳性的风险因素。在118名登记工人中,新冠病毒的基线血清阳性率为50.0%。肉类加工厂工人的新冠病毒血清阳性率最高(64.6%),其次是农场工人(45.0%)和农产品加工工人(10.0%),尽管他们的社会人口特征相似。与新冠病毒血清阴性的工人相比,血清阳性的工人更有可能在需要大声呼喊才能交流的嘈杂环境中工作(相对风险:1.83,95%置信区间:1.25 - 2.69)、在寒冷环境中工作(相对风险:1.58,95%置信区间:1.12 - 2.24),或者在工作中出现症状后仍继续工作(相对风险:1.63,95%置信区间:1.14 - 2.32)。在调整年龄和症状出现后仍继续工作的因素后,高职业噪声水平与新冠病毒血清阳性风险高1.72倍相关(95%置信区间:1.16 - 2.55)。一半的食品加工工人显示有既往新冠病毒感染的证据,这一患病率比研究时美国大多数人群高出五倍。环境噪声大的工作环境可能会增加新冠病毒传播的风险。我们的研究结果还凸显了美国未得到充分服务和经济上处于不利地位的拉丁裔社区中新冠疫情造成的不成比例的负担。

相似文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and risk factors among meat packing, produce processing, and farm workers.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;2(7):e0000619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000619. eCollection 2022.
3
Risk of COVID-19 in health-care workers in Denmark: an observational cohort study.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(12):1401-1408. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30589-2. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
6
High seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Ethiopian healthcare workers.
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07247-z.
9
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
10
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among healthcare workers.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 25;17(4):e0266410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266410. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Persistence of neutralizing antibodies a year after SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans.
Eur J Immunol. 2021 Dec;51(12):3202-3213. doi: 10.1002/eji.202149535. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
SARS-CoV-2 testing in North Carolina: Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities.
Health Place. 2021 May;69:102576. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102576. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
Magnitude of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases throughout the course of infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 23;16(3):e0249090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249090. eCollection 2021.
5
Current understanding of the influence of environmental factors on SARS-CoV-2 transmission, persistence, and infectivity.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(6):6267-6288. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12165-1. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
7
Estimated SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in the US as of September 2020.
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Apr 1;181(4):450-460. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7976.
8
Livestock plants and COVID-19 transmission.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 15;117(50):31706-31715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010115117. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
9
Coronavirus Disease among Workers in Food Processing, Food Manufacturing, and Agriculture Workplaces.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):243-9. doi: 10.3201/eid2701.203821. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验