Klein Melissa D, Sciaudone Michael, Richardson David, Lacayo Roberto, McClean Colleen M, Kharabora Oksana, Murray Katherine, Zivanovich Miriana Moreno, Strohminger Stephen, Gurnett Rachel, Markmann Alena J, Bhowmik D Ryan, Salgado Emperatriz Morales, Castro-Arroyo Edwin, Aiello Allison E, Boyce Ross M, Juliano Jonathan J, Bowman Natalie M
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;2(7):e0000619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000619. eCollection 2022.
Meat packing, produce processing, and farm workers are known to have an elevated risk of COVID-19, but occupational risk factors in this population are unclear. We performed an observational cohort study of meat packing, produce processing, and farm workers in North Carolina in fall 2020. Blood, saliva, and nasal turbinate samples were collected to assess for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity were investigated using chi-square tests, two-sample t-tests, and adjusted risk ratio analyses. Among 118 enrolled workers, the baseline SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was 50.0%. Meat packing plant workers had the highest SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence (64.6%), followed by farm workers (45.0%) and produce processing workers (10.0%), despite similar sociodemographic characteristics. Compared to SARS-CoV-2 seronegative workers, seropositive workers were more likely to work in loud environments that necessitated yelling to communicate (RR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.25-2.69), work in cold environments (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.12-2.24), or continue working despite developing symptoms at work (RR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.14-2.32). After adjusting for age and working despite symptoms, high occupational noise levels were associated with a 1.72 times higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (95% CI: 1.16-2.55). Half of food processing workers showed evidence of past SARS-CoV-2 infection, a prevalence five times higher than most of the United States population at the time of the study. Work environments with loud ambient noise may pose elevated risks for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Our findings also highlight the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 among underserved and economically disadvantaged Latinx communities in the United States.
众所周知,肉类加工、农产品加工和农场工人感染新冠病毒的风险较高,但该人群的职业风险因素尚不清楚。2020年秋季,我们在北卡罗来纳州对肉类加工、农产品加工和农场工人进行了一项观察性队列研究。采集血液、唾液和鼻甲样本以评估新冠病毒血清阳性情况。使用卡方检验、两样本t检验和调整后的风险比分析来研究新冠病毒血清阳性的风险因素。在118名登记工人中,新冠病毒的基线血清阳性率为50.0%。肉类加工厂工人的新冠病毒血清阳性率最高(64.6%),其次是农场工人(45.0%)和农产品加工工人(10.0%),尽管他们的社会人口特征相似。与新冠病毒血清阴性的工人相比,血清阳性的工人更有可能在需要大声呼喊才能交流的嘈杂环境中工作(相对风险:1.83,95%置信区间:1.25 - 2.69)、在寒冷环境中工作(相对风险:1.58,95%置信区间:1.12 - 2.24),或者在工作中出现症状后仍继续工作(相对风险:1.63,95%置信区间:1.14 - 2.32)。在调整年龄和症状出现后仍继续工作的因素后,高职业噪声水平与新冠病毒血清阳性风险高1.72倍相关(95%置信区间:1.16 - 2.55)。一半的食品加工工人显示有既往新冠病毒感染的证据,这一患病率比研究时美国大多数人群高出五倍。环境噪声大的工作环境可能会增加新冠病毒传播的风险。我们的研究结果还凸显了美国未得到充分服务和经济上处于不利地位的拉丁裔社区中新冠疫情造成的不成比例的负担。