Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 15;20(6):5202. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065202.
Reliable and valid cognitive outcome measures, including examiner-administered and computer-facilitated assessments of processing speed and reaction time, are necessary for future clinical trials that include individuals with Down syndrome (DS). The current study evaluated the score distributions and psychometric properties of four examiner-administered and three computerized processing speed and reaction time measures. Participants included 97 individuals with DS, aged 6 to 17 (M = 12.6, SD = 3.3). Two examiner-administered measures (Differential Ability Scales-II Rapid Naming and Cat/dog Stroop Congruent) met most predetermined psychometric criteria. Other assessments demonstrated good test-retest reliability and had negligible practice effects but lacked adequate feasibility. Recommendations for using processing speed and reaction time assessments in research and suggestions for modifications of measures are discussed.
可靠且有效的认知结果测量方法,包括对处理速度和反应时间进行的测试者施测和计算机辅助评估,对于包含唐氏综合征(DS)患者的未来临床试验是必要的。本研究评估了四种测试者施测和三种计算机化处理速度和反应时间测量方法的分数分布和心理测量特性。参与者包括 97 名年龄在 6 至 17 岁(M = 12.6,SD = 3.3)的 DS 患者。两项测试者施测的测量方法(《差异能力量表-II 快速命名》和《猫/狗 Stroop 一致》)符合大多数预先设定的心理测量标准。其他评估方法具有良好的重测信度,且练习效应可忽略不计,但缺乏足够的可行性。本文讨论了在研究中使用处理速度和反应时间评估的建议,并提出了对测量方法的修改建议。