Suppr超能文献

慢性淋巴细胞白血病中 DNA 损伤反应蛋白表达模式的预后预测。

Prognostication of DNA Damage Response Protein Expression Patterns in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry, and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 13;24(6):5481. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065481.

Abstract

Proteomic DNA Damage Repair (DDR) expression patterns in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia were characterized by quantifying and clustering 24 total and phosphorylated DDR proteins. Overall, three protein expression patterns (C1-C3) were identified and were associated as an independent predictor of distinct patient overall survival outcomes. Patients within clusters C1 and C2 had poorer survival outcomes and responses to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituxan chemotherapy compared to patients within cluster C3. However, DDR protein expression patterns were not prognostic in more modern therapies with BCL2 inhibitors or a BTK/PI3K inhibitor. Individually, nine of the DDR proteins were prognostic for predicting overall survival and/or time to first treatment. When looking for other proteins that may be associated with or influenced by DDR expression patterns, our differential expression analysis found that cell cycle and adhesion proteins were lower in clusters compared to normal CD19 controls. In addition, cluster C3 had a lower expression of MAPK proteins compared to the poor prognostic patient clusters thus implying a potential regulatory connection between adhesion, cell cycle, MAPK, and DDR signaling in CLL. Thus, assessing the proteomic expression of DNA damage proteins in CLL provided novel insights for deciphering influences on patient outcomes and expanded our understanding of the potential complexities and effects of DDR cell signaling.

摘要

通过定量和聚类 24 种总 DDR 蛋白和磷酸化 DDR 蛋白,对慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的蛋白质组 DNA 损伤修复(DDR)表达模式进行了特征描述。总体而言,鉴定了三种蛋白表达模式(C1-C3),并将其作为独立预测不同患者总生存结果的指标。与 C3 组患者相比,C1 和 C2 组患者的生存结果和对氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗化疗的反应更差。然而,在使用 BCL2 抑制剂或 BTK/PI3K 抑制剂的现代治疗中,DDR 蛋白表达模式没有预后意义。单独来看,9 种 DDR 蛋白对预测总生存期和/或首次治疗时间具有预后意义。在寻找可能与 DDR 表达模式相关或受其影响的其他蛋白时,我们的差异表达分析发现,与正常 CD19 对照相比,各聚类中的细胞周期和黏附蛋白表达水平较低。此外,与预后不良的患者聚类相比,C3 聚类中 MAPK 蛋白的表达水平较低,这意味着在 CLL 中黏附、细胞周期、MAPK 和 DDR 信号之间可能存在潜在的调节关系。因此,评估 CLL 中 DNA 损伤蛋白的蛋白质组表达为破译对患者结局的影响提供了新的见解,并扩展了我们对 DDR 细胞信号潜在复杂性和影响的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d09/10049670/27f286b9b7ba/ijms-24-05481-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验