Suppr超能文献

联合主动脉瓣和二尖瓣置换术中传统生物瓣膜与无缝合主动脉瓣假体的比较。

Conventional Biological versus Sutureless Aortic Valve Prostheses in Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement.

作者信息

Zubarevich Alina, Szczechowicz Marcin, Arjomandi Rad Arian, Amanov Lukman, Ruhparwar Arjang, Weymann Alexander

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.

Clinical Academic Graduate School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 9;13(3):737. doi: 10.3390/life13030737.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sutureless aortic valve prostheses have proven to provide a significant decrease in procedural, cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time, leading to a significant reduction in mortality risk in elderly high-risk cohorts. In this study, we sought to review our institutional experience on the sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) and the concomitant mitral valve replacement (SMVR), comparing the combined conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with SMVR.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Between March 2018 and July 2022, 114 consecutive patients underwent a combined aortic and mitral valve replacement at our institution. We stratified the patients according to the operative procedures into two groups and matched them 1:2: Group 1 underwent a combined conventional SAVR and SMVR (n = 46), and Group 2 included combined SU-AVR with Perceval prosthesis and SMVR (n = 23).

RESULTS

No significant differences in the preoperative characteristics were present. SU-AVR combined with SMVR demonstrated excellent haemodynamic performance, comparable to that of SAVR plus SMVR, with median postoperative gradients over the aortic valve of 4 mmHg (IQR 3.0-4.0) in Group 1 and 4 mmHg (IQR 3.0-4.0) in Group 2 ( = 0.67). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative major adverse events such as death, stroke, myocardial infarction and kidney failure between the groups. There was also no significant difference in the permanent pacemaker implantation rate, paravalvular leakage or valve dislocation. We also could not detect any significant difference in postoperative mortality between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SU-AVR has proven to be a reliable alternative to conventional valve prostheses in patients with multivalve disease undergoing combined aortic and mitral valve replacement, offering shorter procedural time and outstanding hemodynamic performance compared to the conventional surgical method.

摘要

背景

已证实无缝合主动脉瓣假体可显著缩短手术、体外循环和主动脉阻断时间,从而显著降低老年高危人群的死亡风险。在本研究中,我们试图回顾我们机构在无缝合主动脉瓣置换术(SU-AVR)和同期二尖瓣置换术(SMVR)方面的经验,将联合传统外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)与SMVR进行比较。

方法和材料

2018年3月至2022年7月期间,114例连续患者在我们机构接受了主动脉瓣和二尖瓣联合置换术。我们根据手术方式将患者分为两组,并按1:2进行匹配:第1组接受联合传统SAVR和SMVR(n = 46),第2组包括联合使用Perceval假体的SU-AVR和SMVR(n = 23)。

结果

术前特征无显著差异。SU-AVR联合SMVR表现出优异的血流动力学性能,与SAVR加SMVR相当,第1组术后主动脉瓣平均压差为4 mmHg(IQR 3.0 - 4.0),第2组为4 mmHg(IQR 3.0 - 4.0)(P = 0.67)。两组之间术后主要不良事件如死亡、中风、心肌梗死和肾衰竭的发生率无显著差异。永久起搏器植入率、瓣周漏或瓣膜脱位也无显著差异。我们也未发现两组之间术后死亡率有任何显著差异。

结论

对于接受主动脉瓣和二尖瓣联合置换术的多瓣膜病患者,SU-AVR已被证明是传统瓣膜假体的可靠替代方案,与传统手术方法相比,手术时间更短,血流动力学性能更出色。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1145/10056806/5827df9b1131/life-13-00737-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验