Sakib-Uz-Zaman Chowdhury, Khondoker Mohammad Abu Hasan
Industrial Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Mar 17;15(6):1506. doi: 10.3390/polym15061506.
The conventional manufacturing methods for fabricating orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) devices have been in practice for a very long time. Recently, O&P service providers have started exploring different advanced manufacturing techniques. The objective of this paper is to perform a mini review on recent progress in the use of polymer-based additive manufacturing (AM) for O&P devices and to gather insights from the O&P professionals on the current practices and technologies and on the prospect of using AM techniques in this field. In our study, first, scientific articles on AM for O&P devices were studied. Then, twenty-two (22) interviews were conducted with O&P professionals from Canada. The primary focus was on five key areas: cost, material, design and fabrication efficiency, structural strength, functionality, and patient satisfaction. The cost of manufacturing the O&P devices using AM techniques is lower as compared to the conventional methods. O&P professionals expressed their concern over the materials and structural strength of the 3D-printed prosthetic devices. Published articles report comparable functionality and patient satisfaction for both O&P devices. AM also greatly improves design and fabrication efficiency. However, due to a lack of qualification standards for 3D printed O&P devices, 3D printing is being embraced more slowly in the O&P business than in other industries.
制造矫形和假肢(O&P)设备的传统制造方法已经应用了很长时间。最近,O&P服务提供商开始探索不同的先进制造技术。本文的目的是对基于聚合物的增材制造(AM)在O&P设备中的应用最新进展进行简要综述,并收集O&P专业人士对当前实践和技术以及在该领域使用AM技术前景的见解。在我们的研究中,首先,研究了关于用于O&P设备的AM的科学文章。然后,对来自加拿大的O&P专业人士进行了22次访谈。主要关注五个关键领域:成本、材料、设计和制造效率、结构强度、功能以及患者满意度。与传统方法相比,使用AM技术制造O&P设备的成本更低。O&P专业人士对3D打印假肢设备的材料和结构强度表示担忧。已发表的文章报告了O&P设备在功能和患者满意度方面具有可比性。AM还极大地提高了设计和制造效率。然而,由于缺乏3D打印O&P设备的资质标准,3D打印在O&P行业中的应用比其他行业更为缓慢。