Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Teglgaards Plads 1, Aalborg, 9000, Denmark.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Sep;57(3):719-737. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09757-0. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
The relationship between biology and the psy disciplines (psychology, psychiatry, and psychotherapy) is a complex one. Many scholars have criticized how these disciplines have been biologized in the 20th century, especially since the emergence of psychopharmacology, neuroscience, and genetic research. However, biology is not just a laboratory-based science of chemical compounds, scanners, and DNA sequencing, but also a field science based on observations of organisms in their milieus. In this paper, we draw a contrast between laboratory-based biology with a focus on brains and genes, and an ecology-based biology with a focus on lives and niches. Our argument is philosophical in nature - building partly on Wittgenstein as a "philosopher of life" - to the effect that the psy sciences need not just less biologization of the former kind, but also more biologization of the latter kind to avoid a prevalent mentalism. Not least when it comes to an understanding of psychological distress, which can favorably be viewed situationally and coupled to human lives in ecological niches.
生物学与心理学科(心理学、精神病学和心理治疗学)之间的关系非常复杂。许多学者批评了这些学科在 20 世纪被生物学化的现象,尤其是在精神药理学、神经科学和基因研究出现之后。然而,生物学不仅仅是一门基于实验室的化学物质、扫描仪和 DNA 测序的科学,它也是一门基于对生物体在其环境中的观察的领域科学。在本文中,我们将重点放在大脑和基因上的基于实验室的生物学与重点放在生命和生态位上的基于生态学的生物学进行了对比。我们的论点在本质上是哲学性的——部分基于作为“生命哲学家”的维特根斯坦——即心理科学不仅需要减少前一种生物学化,还需要更多地进行后一种生物学化,以避免普遍存在的唯灵论。尤其是当涉及到对心理困扰的理解时,这种理解可以从情境上有利地看待,并与人类在生态位中的生活联系起来。