Suppr超能文献

远程医疗绝育咨询并不影响输精管切除术的可能性:回顾性机构分析。

Telehealth Sterilization Consultation Does Not Impact Likelihood of Vasectomy: A Retrospective Institutional Analysis.

机构信息

Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL.

Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL.

出版信息

Urology. 2023 Jun;176:79-81. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.03.019. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if telehealth consultations would impact the likelihood of patients following through with vasectomies.

METHODS

We utilized electronic medical records from the past 5 years to retrospectively evaluate male patients undergoing a sterilization consult. Telehealth consultations have been offered since March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients were stratified to in-office or telehealth consultation. We then utilized billing codes to determine if patients underwent a vasectomy. Percentages of patients who subsequently underwent vasectomy were compared using Chi-square analysis. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with completing vasectomy.

RESULTS

There were a total of 369 patients who underwent a telehealth male sterilization consultation and 1664 patients who were seen in the office. We found that 66.9% of telehealth patients ultimately underwent a vasectomy (n.ß=.ß247) compared to 64.3% of patients who were seen via office assessment (n.ß=.ß1070) (X =.ß0.646, p.ß=.ß.724). Younger age was the only variable on univariate logistic regression that was associated with completing vasectomy (p.ß=.ß.002) via either an in-person or televisit, while body mass index, race, and ethnicity were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Only 2/3 of the men completing a vasectomy consult receive a subsequent vasectomy. Both in-office and telehealth consultations resulted in comparable rates of vasectomy. This is the first study to report on the likelihood of following through with a surgical procedure comparing in-office vs.ßtelehealth assessment in male sexual and reproductive medicine. As vasectomy consultations continue to rise, clinicians can be reassured by the effectiveness of telehealth consultations prior to vasectomy.

摘要

目的

评估远程医疗咨询是否会影响患者接受输精管切除术的可能性。

方法

我们利用过去 5 年的电子病历,回顾性评估接受绝育咨询的男性患者。自 2020 年 3 月以来,由于 COVID-19 大流行,已经提供了远程医疗咨询。患者分为门诊或远程医疗咨询。然后,我们利用计费代码来确定患者是否接受了输精管切除术。使用卡方分析比较随后接受输精管切除术的患者比例。进行逻辑回归以确定与完成输精管切除术相关的因素。

结果

共有 369 名患者接受了远程男性绝育咨询,1664 名患者在办公室就诊。我们发现,66.9%的远程医疗患者最终接受了输精管切除术(n.ß=.ß247),而通过办公室评估的患者为 64.3%(n.ß=.ß1070)(X =.ß0.646,p.ß=.ß.724)。在单变量逻辑回归中,只有年龄是与通过面对面或电视就诊完成输精管切除术相关的唯一变量(p.ß=.ß.002),而体重指数、种族和民族则没有统计学意义。

结论

只有 2/3 的接受输精管切除术咨询的男性接受了随后的输精管切除术。门诊和远程医疗咨询都导致输精管切除术的比率相当。这是第一项报告在男性性和生殖医学中比较门诊与远程医疗评估后进行手术的可能性的研究。随着输精管切除术咨询的持续增加,临床医生可以放心,远程医疗咨询在输精管切除术之前是有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验