The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) & The NeuroRecovery Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX.
MicroTransponder, Inc, Austin, TX.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Aug;104(8):1180-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.02.012. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
To assess whether a long-term home-based intervention using Paired VNS therapy is feasible and whether the benefits of Paired VNS therapy are maintained beyond 1 year.
A long-term follow-up study.
Three centers in the United States and 1 in the United Kingdom.
Adults with chronic ischemic stroke (n=15) with moderate to severe arm and hand impairment.
Participants were implanted with a VNS device followed by 6 weeks of in-clinic therapy with Paired (Active) or control VNS followed by home-based rehabilitation through day 90 (blinded phase). The control VNS group then crossed over to receive 6 weeks of in-clinic Active VNS. Participants in both groups then continued a long-term home exercise program with self-administered Active VNS.
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Functional scores were evaluated at the end of in-clinic therapy and day 90. Since both groups were subsequently receiving home-based rehabilitation with Active VNS during the long term, follow-up outcome assessments were pooled for the analyses at 6, 9, and 12 months, as previously reported. Here, we report pooled analysis of outcomes beyond 1 year.
One year after Paired VNS therapy, FMA-UE improved by an average of 9.2±8.2 points, as previously reported. Overall, the 2- and 3-year FMA-UE gain from baseline was 11.4±8.7 (P<.001) and 14.8±10.2 points (P<.001), respectively. At years 2 and 3, FMA-UE improved by an additional 2.9 (P=.03 for change vs year 1, n=14) and 4.7 (P=.02 for change vs year 1, n=14) points, respectively. At year 1, 73% (11/15) of participants were responders (FMA-UE change ≥6) and by year 3, 85.7% (12/14) were responders. At years 2 and 3, the WMFT score improved by an additional 0.21 points (P=.03 for change vs year 1, n=15) and 0.42 points (P=.01 for change vs year 1, n=13), respectively. Responder rate (WMFT change ≥0.4) was 46.6% (7/15), 73.3% (11/15), and 69.2% (9/13) at years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Long-term significant improvements were also observed for Motor Activity Log (MAL) and Stroke Impact Scale, Hand section (SIS-Hand). There were no serious long-term adverse events from the stimulation.
Significant effects of Paired VNS therapy at 1 year were maintained at years 2 and 3, and further improvements in both impairment and function were observed in years 2 and 3. These changes were associated with improvements in measures of activity and participation.
评估长期家庭使用配对迷走神经刺激(Paired VNS)疗法是否可行,以及 Paired VNS 疗法的益处是否能持续 1 年以上。
长期随访研究。
美国 3 个中心和英国 1 个中心。
患有慢性缺血性中风的成年人(n=15),手臂和手部有中度至重度障碍。
参与者植入 VNS 设备,随后进行 6 周的门诊 Paired(主动)或对照 VNS 治疗,然后进行为期 90 天的家庭康复(盲法阶段)。对照组随后交叉接受 6 周的门诊主动 VNS。两组参与者随后继续进行长期家庭运动计划,并自行进行主动 VNS。
上肢 Fugl-Meyer 评估(FMA-UE)和 Wolf 运动功能测试(WMFT)功能评分在门诊治疗结束时和第 90 天进行评估。由于两组在长期随访中都接受了主动 VNS 的家庭康复治疗,因此之前的报告中对 6、9 和 12 个月的随访结果进行了汇总分析。在这里,我们报告了超过 1 年的结果汇总分析。
在 Paired VNS 治疗 1 年后,FMA-UE 平均改善了 9.2±8.2 分,如前所述。总的来说,从基线到 2 年和 3 年的 FMA-UE 增益分别为 11.4±8.7(P<.001)和 14.8±10.2 分(P<.001)。在第 2 年和第 3 年,FMA-UE 分别额外改善了 2.9(P=.03,与第 1 年相比,n=14)和 4.7(P=.02,与第 1 年相比,n=14)分。在第 1 年,73%(11/15)的参与者为应答者(FMA-UE 变化≥6),到第 3 年,85.7%(12/14)为应答者。在第 2 年和第 3 年,WMFT 评分分别额外提高了 0.21 分(P=.03,与第 1 年相比,n=15)和 0.42 分(P=.01,与第 1 年相比,n=13)。应答率(WMFT 变化≥0.4)分别为第 1 年 46.6%(7/15)、第 2 年 73.3%(11/15)和第 3 年 69.2%(9/13)。在第 2 年和第 3 年,运动活动日志(MAL)和中风影响量表,手部部分(SIS-Hand)也观察到了显著的长期改善。刺激没有引起严重的长期不良事件。
在第 1 年观察到 Paired VNS 疗法的显著效果在第 2 年和第 3 年得以维持,并且在第 2 年和第 3 年观察到了在功能和活动方面的进一步改善。这些变化与活动和参与度的改善相关。