University of Helsinki, Finland.
Soc Stud Sci. 2023 Jun;53(3):449-471. doi: 10.1177/03063127231162082. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
This article explores a case of mistrust in global health research and community engagement. It uses ethnographic material collected in 2014 and 2016 in Kenya, concerning community engagement by a HIV vaccine research group working with men who have sex with men and transgender women. In 2010, the research group was attacked by members of the wider community. Following the attack, the research group set up an engagement program to reduce mistrust and re-build relationships. Analysis focusing on mistrust shows the dynamics underlying the conflict: Norms around gender and sexuality, political support for LGBTIQ+ rights, and resources disparities were all at stake for those embroiled in the conflict, including researchers, study participants, religious leaders, and LGBTIQ+ activists in the region. Rather than a normative good with liberatory potential, community engagement in this paper is discussed as a relational tool with which mistrust was managed, highlighting the fragility of participation.
本文探讨了对全球健康研究和社区参与的信任缺失问题。它使用了 2014 年和 2016 年在肯尼亚收集的民族志材料,涉及一个艾滋病毒疫苗研究小组与男男性行为者和跨性别女性合作进行社区参与的情况。2010 年,该研究小组遭到了更广泛社区成员的攻击。袭击发生后,该研究小组设立了一个参与方案,以减少不信任并重建关系。对不信任的分析揭示了冲突背后的动态:围绕性别和性取向的规范、对男女同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和无性恋(LGBTIQ+)权利的政治支持,以及资源差距,对于卷入冲突的人来说,包括研究人员、研究参与者、宗教领袖和该地区的 LGBTIQ+活动家,都是利害攸关的。本文认为,社区参与不是具有解放潜力的规范性善举,而是一种管理不信任的关系工具,突出了参与的脆弱性。