Suppr超能文献

经导管与手术治疗孤立性上腔静脉窦型房间隔缺损的比较。

Transcatheter versus surgical treatment for isolated superior sinus venosus atrial septal defect.

机构信息

Department of Congenital Cardiology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Department of Pediatrics, Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May;101(6):1098-1107. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30650. Epub 2023 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The superior sinus venosus atrial septal defect is a congenital communication between the left and right atria. Open surgical approach by patch closure has historically been the only treatment option. Recently, a transcatheter approach has been developed. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical and transcatheter approach in treatment of sinus venosus atrial septal defect.

METHODS

Between March 2010 and December 2020, 58 patients (median age: 45.4, range 14.8-73.8) underwent either surgical or transcatheter correction of superior sinus venosus atrial septal defect with partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (median age: 35.4, range 14.8-66.8) underwent surgery while 34 patients (median age: 46.8, range 15.5-73.8) had a transcatheter treatment. During the catheterization era, 41 patients was considered suitable for a transcatheter closure. In 5 patients, surgery was the patient's or referring physician's choice. In 2 cases, the procedure was unsuccessful; the remaining 34 were successfully closed (94.4% of cases). Intensive care unit stay (median of 1 day, range 0.5-4, vs. 0, range 0-2, p < 0.0001) and hospital stay (median 7 days, range 2-15 vs. 2 days, range 1-12, p < 0.0001), were significantly longer in the surgery group. Total early complication rate, consisted on procedural and in-hospital complication, were higher in the surgical group (62.5% vs. 23.5%; p = 0.005). However, complications in both groups were clinically mild. At follow-up, a small residual shunt was present in 6 patients (surgery group: 2 pts; catheterization group: 4 pts; p: NS). Imaging studies showed significant improvement of right ventricular size and unobstructed pulmonary venous return in all patients. No late complications occurred at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter correction of sinus venosus atrial septal defect is effective and safe in selected patients and may be considered as a valid alternative to surgery.

摘要

背景

上腔静脉窦型房间隔缺损是左、右心房之间的先天性交通。传统上,开放手术修补一直是唯一的治疗选择。最近,已经开发出一种经导管方法。本研究旨在比较手术和经导管方法治疗上腔静脉窦型房间隔缺损的疗效和安全性。

方法

2010 年 3 月至 2020 年 12 月,58 例患者(中位年龄:45.4 岁,范围 14.8-73.8 岁)接受了手术或经导管治疗上腔静脉窦型房间隔缺损合并部分肺静脉异常引流。

结果

24 例患者(中位年龄:35.4 岁,范围 14.8-66.8 岁)接受了手术治疗,34 例患者(中位年龄:46.8 岁,范围 15.5-73.8 岁)接受了经导管治疗。在经导管治疗时代,41 例患者适合经导管闭合。在 5 例患者中,手术是患者或转诊医生的选择。在 2 例患者中,手术不成功;其余 34 例患者成功闭合(94.4%的病例)。手术组的重症监护病房停留时间(中位数为 1 天,范围 0.5-4 天,vs. 0 天,范围 0-2 天,p<0.0001)和住院时间(中位数为 7 天,范围 2-15 天,vs. 2 天,范围 1-12 天,p<0.0001)明显更长。手术组的总早期并发症发生率(包括手术和住院期间的并发症)较高(62.5%vs.23.5%;p=0.005)。然而,两组的并发症均为临床轻度。在随访时,6 例患者(手术组 2 例;导管组 4 例)存在小残余分流(p:NS)。影像学研究显示所有患者的右心室大小和肺静脉回流均有明显改善。在随访中未发生晚期并发症。

结论

在选择的患者中,经导管治疗上腔静脉窦型房间隔缺损是有效和安全的,可作为手术的有效替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验