Suppr超能文献

多学科研究团队的协作团队动态与学术成果:一种混合方法研究

Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach.

作者信息

Slade Emily, Kern Philip A, Kegebein Robert L, Liu Chang, Thompson Joel C, Kelly Thomas H, King Victoria L, DiPaola Robert S, Surratt Hilary L

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 3;7(1):e59. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.9. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Impactful, transdisciplinary scientific discoveries are created by teams of researchers spanning multiple disciplines, but collaboration across disciplines can be challenging. We examined how team dynamics and collaboration are related to successes and barriers faced by teams of researchers from multiple disciplines.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was used to examine 12 research teams granted multidisciplinary pilot awards. Team members were surveyed to assess their team dynamics and individual views about transdisciplinary research. Forty-seven researchers (59.5%) responded, including two to eight members from each funded team. Associations were examined between collaborative dynamics and scholarly product outcomes, including manuscripts, grant proposals, and awarded grants. One member from each team was selected for an in-depth interview to contextualize and extend information about collaborative processes, successes, and barriers to performing transdisciplinary research.

RESULTS

Quality of team interactions was positively associated with achievement of scholarly products ( = 0.64, = 0.02). Satisfaction with team members ( = 0.38) and team collaboration scores ( = 0.43) also demonstrated positive associations with achievement of scholarly products, but these were not statistically significant. Qualitative results support these findings and add further insight into aspects of the collaborative process that were particularly important to foster success on multidisciplinary teams. Beyond scholarly metrics, additional successes from the multidisciplinary teams were identified through the qualitative portion of the study including career development and acceleration for early career researchers.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the quantitative and qualitative study results indicate that effective collaboration is critical to multidisciplinary research team success. Development and/or promotion of team science-based trainings for researchers would promote these collaborative skills.

摘要

引言

有影响力的跨学科科学发现是由跨多个学科的研究团队创造的,但跨学科合作可能具有挑战性。我们研究了团队动态和合作如何与来自多个学科的研究团队所面临的成功与障碍相关。

方法

采用混合方法研究12个获得多学科试点奖励的研究团队。对团队成员进行了调查,以评估他们的团队动态以及对跨学科研究的个人看法。47名研究人员(59.5%)做出了回应,每个获得资助的团队有2至8名成员。研究了合作动态与学术成果之间的关联,包括手稿、资助申请和获批资助。从每个团队中挑选一名成员进行深入访谈,以将有关合作过程、成功经验和开展跨学科研究的障碍的信息置于具体情境中并加以扩展。

结果

团队互动质量与学术成果的达成呈正相关(r = 0.64,p = 0.02)。对团队成员的满意度(r = 0.38)和团队合作得分(r = 0.43)也与学术成果的达成呈正相关,但这些在统计学上并不显著。定性结果支持了这些发现,并进一步深入了解了合作过程中对多学科团队取得成功尤为重要的方面。除了学术指标外,通过研究的定性部分还确定了多学科团队的其他成功之处,包括早期职业研究人员的职业发展和加速。

结论

定量和定性研究结果均表明,有效的合作对于多学科研究团队的成功至关重要。为研究人员开发和/或推广基于团队科学的培训将提升这些合作技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b354/10052417/153fdcad797e/S2059866123000092_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验