Pandurevic Srdjan, Mancini Ilaria, Mitselman Dimitri, Magagnoli Matteo, Teglia Rita, Fazzeri Roberta, Dionese Paola, Cecchetti Carolina, Caprio Massimiliamo, Moretti Costanzo, Sicinska Justyna, Agostini Alessandro, Gazineo Domenica, Godino Lea, Sajoux Ignacio, Fanelli Flaminia, Meriggiola Cristina M, Pagotto Uberto, Gambineri Alessandra
Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes Prevention and Care, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Endocr Connect. 2023 Jun 12;12(7). doi: 10.1530/EC-22-0536. Print 2023 Jul 1.
The aim of this study isto assess the efficacy of a very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) method vs a Mediterranean low-calorie diet (LCD) in obese polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women of a reproductive age.
Randomized controlled open-label trial was performed in this study. The treatment period was 16 weeks; VLCKD for 8 weeks then LCD for 8 weeks, according to the Pronokal® method (experimental group; n = 15) vs Mediterranean LCD for 16 weeks (control group; n = 15). Ovulation monitoring was carried out at baseline and after 16 weeks, while a clinical exam, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), anthropometry, and biochemical analyses were performed at baseline, at week 8, and at week 16.
BMI decreased significantly in both groups and to a major extent in the experimental group (-13.7% vs -5.1%, P = 0.0003). Significant differences between the experimental and the control groups were also observed in the reduction of waist circumference (-11.4% vs -2.9%), BIA-measured body fat (-24.0% vs -8.1%), and free testosterone (-30.4% vs -12.6%) after 16 weeks (P = 0.0008, P = 0.0176, and P = 0.0009, respectively). Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance significantly decreased only in the experimental group (P = 0.0238) but without significant differences with respect to the control group (-23% vs -13.2%, P > 0.05). At baseline, 38.5% of participants in the experimental group and 14.3% of participants in the control group had ovulation, which increased to 84.6% (P = 0.031) and 35.7% (P > 0.05) at the end of the study, respectively.
In obese PCOS patients, 16 weeks of VLCKD protocol with the Pronokal® method was more effective than Mediterranean LCD in reducing total and visceral fat, and in ameliorating hyperandrogenism and ovulatory dysfunction.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial on the use of the VLCKD method in obese PCOS. It demonstrates the superiority of VLCKD with respect to Mediterranean LCD in reducing BMI with an almost selective reduction of fat mass and a unique effect of VLCKD in reducing visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, and in increasing SHBG with a consequent reduction of free testosterone. Interestingly, this study also demonstrates the superiority of the VLCKD protocol in improving ovulation, whose occurrence increased by 46.1% in the group treated by the VLCKD method against a rise of 21.4% in the group treated by Mediterranean LCD. This study extends the therapeutic approach possibilities in obese PCOS women.
本研究旨在评估极低热量生酮饮食(VLCKD)法与地中海低热量饮食(LCD)对育龄肥胖多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)女性的疗效。
本研究采用随机对照开放标签试验。治疗期为16周;按照Pronokal®方法,VLCKD组8周,然后LCD组8周(实验组;n = 15),对照组为地中海LCD饮食16周(n = 15)。在基线和16周后进行排卵监测,同时在基线、第8周和第16周进行临床检查、生物电阻抗分析(BIA)、人体测量和生化分析。
两组的体重指数(BMI)均显著下降,且实验组下降幅度更大(-13.7%对-5.1%,P = 0.0003)。16周后,实验组和对照组在腰围减少(-11.4%对-2.9%)、BIA测量的体脂减少(-24.0%对-8.1%)和游离睾酮减少(-30.4%对-12.6%)方面也存在显著差异(分别为P = 0.0008、P = 0.0176和P = 0.0009)。仅实验组的胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估显著降低(P = 0.0238),但与对照组相比无显著差异(-23%对-13.2%,P > 0.05)。基线时,实验组38.5%的参与者和对照组14.3%的参与者有排卵,研究结束时分别增至84.6%(P = 0.031)和35.7%(P > 0.05)。
在肥胖PCOS患者中,采用Pronokal®方法进行16周的VLCKD方案在减少总体脂肪和内脏脂肪、改善高雄激素血症和排卵功能障碍方面比地中海LCD更有效。
据我们所知,这是第一项关于在肥胖PCOS中使用VLCKD方法的随机对照试验。它证明了VLCKD相对于地中海LCD在降低BMI方面的优越性,几乎选择性地减少了脂肪量,且VLCKD在减少内脏脂肪、胰岛素抵抗以及增加性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)从而降低游离睾酮方面具有独特作用。有趣的是,本研究还证明了VLCKD方案在改善排卵方面的优越性,VLCKD治疗组的排卵发生率增加了46.1%,而地中海LCD治疗组仅增加了21.4%。本研究扩展了肥胖PCOS女性的治疗方法可能性。