Xian Zhihan, Yoo Jiyoon, Patel Chadni, Yang Helen, Deng Xiangyu, Hammack Thomas, Chen Yi
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA.
Department of Food Science, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223, USA.
J Food Prot. 2023 May;86(5):100013. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
Comparisons among a qPCR assay, VIDAS® assays and a conventional agar streaking method following the same enrichment for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes were performed under two challenging conditions. In the first comparison, L. innocua and L. monocytogenes were coinoculated into sausages at ratios (L. innocua-to-L. monocytogenes) of 10, 100, 1000, and 10 000. qPCR provided the most sensitive detection at all ratios after both 24-h and 48-h enrichments. A modified VIDAS® LMO2 assay (i.e., replacement of the kit-specified enrichment scheme with the enrichment scheme used in this study) and agar streaking yielded equivalent results when the ratio was 10 and 100; agar streaking was more sensitive when the ratio was 1000; neither method could detect L. monocytogenes at the ratio of 10 000. Enrichment duration of 48 h was needed for modified VIDAS® to detect L. monocytogenes when the ratio was 1000. Agar streaking after 24-h enrichment isolated L. monocytogenes better than after 48-h enrichment when the ratio was 100 and 1000. In the second comparison, we followed the validation guidelines of AOAC International and inoculated L. monocytogenes, without any L. innocua, onto lettuce and stainless-steel surfaces at low levels. The numbers of positive samples detected by qPCR, VIDAS® LIS assay, modified VIDAS® LMO2 assay, and agar streaking after 48-h enrichment were not statistically different. Our data showed that qPCR was the most sensitive method, while agar streaking and VIDAS® performed reasonably well. Streaking after 24-h enrichment was needed when background flora could overgrow L. monocytogenes during prolonged enrichment, and this is critical for confirming rapid screening assays. Appropriate selection of enrichment duration and rapid assays will enhance the testing of L. monocytogenes in food and environmental samples.
在两种具有挑战性的条件下,对定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测法、VIDAS®检测法以及传统琼脂划线法在检测产单核细胞李斯特菌时采用相同增菌方法后的效果进行了比较。在第一次比较中,无害李斯特菌和产单核细胞李斯特菌以10、100、1000和10000的比例(无害李斯特菌与产单核细胞李斯特菌的比例)共同接种到香肠中。在24小时和48小时增菌后,qPCR在所有比例下均提供了最灵敏的检测结果。当比例为10和100时,改良的VIDAS® LMO2检测法(即用本研究中使用的增菌方案替代试剂盒规定的增菌方案)和琼脂划线法产生了等效结果;当比例为1000时,琼脂划线法更灵敏;当比例为10000时,两种方法均无法检测到产单核细胞李斯特菌。当比例为1000时,改良的VIDAS®检测法需要48小时的增菌时间才能检测到产单核细胞李斯特菌。当比例为100和1000时,24小时增菌后的琼脂划线法比48小时增菌后能更好地分离出产单核细胞李斯特菌。在第二次比较中,我们遵循美国官方分析化学师协会(AOAC)国际组织的验证指南,将产单核细胞李斯特菌(无任何无害李斯特菌)以低水平接种到生菜和不锈钢表面。48小时增菌后,通过qPCR、VIDAS® LIS检测法、改良的VIDAS® LMO2检测法和琼脂划线法检测到的阳性样本数量没有统计学差异。我们的数据表明,qPCR是最灵敏的方法,而琼脂划线法和VIDAS®检测法表现也相当不错。当背景菌群在长时间增菌过程中可能过度生长超过产单核细胞李斯特菌时,需要在24小时增菌后进行划线,这对于确认快速筛选检测至关重要。适当选择增菌时间和快速检测方法将加强对食品和环境样本中产单核细胞李斯特菌的检测。