State Key Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry and CAS center of Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Science, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Department of Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 7;14(1):1963. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37615-5.
The type of lithosphere subducted between India and Tibet since the Paleocene remains controversial; it has been suggested to be either entirely continental, oceanic, or a mixture of the two. As the subduction history of this lost lithosphere strongly shaped Tibetan intraplate tectonism, we attempt to further constrain its nature and density structure with numerical models that aim to reproduce the observed history of magmatism and crustal thickening in addition to present-day plateau properties between 83°E and 88°E. By matching time-evolving geological patterns, here we show that Tibetan tectonism away from the Himalayan syntaxis is consistent with the initial indentation of a craton-like terrane at 55 ± 5 Ma, followed by a buoyant tectonic plate with a thin crust, e.g., a broad continental margin (Himalandia). This new geodynamic scenario can explain the seemingly contradictory observations that had led to competing hypotheses like the subduction of Greater India versus largely oceanic subduction prior to Indian indentation.
自古新世以来,印度和西藏之间俯冲的岩石圈类型仍存在争议;有人认为它完全是大陆性的、海洋性的,或者是两者的混合物。由于这种失落岩石圈的俯冲历史强烈塑造了青藏高原的板块内构造,我们试图通过数值模型进一步限制其性质和密度结构,这些模型旨在再现除了 83°E 到 88°E 之间现今高原特征之外,观测到的岩浆作用和地壳增厚的历史。通过匹配时变地质模式,我们在这里表明,远离喜马拉雅缝合线的青藏高原构造与 55±5Ma 时克拉通样地块的初始俯冲一致,随后是一个具有薄地壳的浮力构造板块,例如宽阔的大陆边缘(喜马拉雅地体)。这种新的地球动力学情景可以解释看似矛盾的观测结果,这些观测结果导致了相互竞争的假设,例如在印度俯冲之前,大印度的俯冲与主要是海洋性的俯冲。