Peking University Institute of Population Research, Beijing, China.
Anjia Hospital, Beijing, China.
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 22;11:1096397. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1096397. eCollection 2023.
The revised Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) and the Brief Visual-Spatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) are two widely used test involving verbal and visual learning and memory. In the two tests, six different versions are assembled, respectively, to prevent learning effects. Currently, no researchers have compared the six versions of the two tests. Thus, their usefulness in clinical studies requiring multiple follow-ups is limited. In this work, we confirm the equivalence of six HVLT-R and BVMT-R versions.
20 people completed all six HVLT-R and BVMT-R versions, while 120 people were randomly assigned to complete one of the six versions of each test. The Intelligence Quotient (IQ) level is measured using the short version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence test. R4.2.0 is used for statistical analysis. The K-Related sample test (a non-parametric test) is used to observe the differences in test scores among the 20 subjects. The one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test is utilized to analyze the differences in test scores among the 120 subjects. The scores on different versions are compared using two similar sample tests. The HVLT-R Total Learning, the HVLT-R Delayed Recall, the BVMT-R Total Learning, and the BVMT-R Delayed Recall are indexes for comparison. Version and test scores are used as research factors, while different versions are used as research levels.
The results suggest that HVLT-R and BVMT-R versions 3, 5 and 6 are equally difficult, and relatively easy compared to versions 1, 2 and 4. HVLT-R versions 3, 5, and 6 show good reliability and can be used interchangeably when testing word learning ability or short-term memory; BVMT-R Versions 3, 5, and 6 show acceptable reliability and can be can be used interchangeably.
In the study of multiple follow-ups, it is a must to avoid discrepant versions and choose other equivalent versions. The results from this study could be used as a guide for upcoming studies and clinical applications in China.
修订后的霍普金斯词语学习测试修订版(HVLT-R)和简要视觉空间记忆测试修订版(BVMT-R)是两种广泛使用的涉及词语和视觉学习及记忆的测试。在这两个测试中,分别组装了六个不同的版本,以防止学习效应。目前,还没有研究人员比较这两个测试的六个版本。因此,它们在需要多次随访的临床研究中的实用性有限。在这项工作中,我们证实了六个 HVLT-R 和 BVMT-R 版本的等效性。
20 人完成了所有六个 HVLT-R 和 BVMT-R 版本,而 120 人被随机分配完成每个测试的六个版本之一。智商(IQ)水平使用韦氏成人智力量表的简短版本进行测量。R4.2.0 用于统计分析。K-相关样本检验(一种非参数检验)用于观察 20 名受试者的测试分数之间的差异。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)检验分析 120 名受试者的测试分数之间的差异。使用两个类似的样本检验比较不同版本的分数。HVLT-R 总学习、HVLT-R 延迟回忆、BVMT-R 总学习和 BVMT-R 延迟回忆是比较的指标。版本和测试分数作为研究因素,而不同的版本作为研究水平。
结果表明,HVLT-R 和 BVMT-R 版本 3、5 和 6 同样困难,与版本 1、2 和 4 相比相对容易。HVLT-R 版本 3、5 和 6 显示出良好的可靠性,在测试词语学习能力或短期记忆时可以互换使用;BVMT-R 版本 3、5 和 6 显示出可接受的可靠性,并且可以互换使用。
在多项随访研究中,必须避免版本不一致,并选择其他等效版本。本研究的结果可以为未来的研究和中国的临床应用提供指导。