Orthopedics. 2023 Nov-Dec;46(6):e362-e368. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20230407-06. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are frequently complicated by acute carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which, if unrecognized, can cause permanent median neuropathy. Some surgeons recommend "prophylactic" carpal tunnel release (CTR) during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of DRF. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety data regarding prophylactic vs symptomatic CTR strategies during DRF fixation are lacking. We conducted a retrospective review of two management strategies for DRFs at our institution (2017 to 2019). Group 1 consisted of patients operated on by two surgeons performing ORIF and symptomatic CTR only for acute CTS. Group 2 consisted of patients operated on by a third surgeon performing ORIF and prophylactic CTR on all patients irrespective of median nerve symptoms. The PROs included QuickDASH Wrist and PROMIS physical/mental health preoperatively vs at final follow-up. Demographic information, complications, and return to the operating room were recorded. Group 1 (36 patients) and group 2 (76 patients) were demographically similar. The mechanism of injury was more severe in group 1 (<.05), but preoperative PROs were similar between the two groups. Eight patients (22.2%) in group 1 had symptomatic CTR for acute CTS. Significant improvement occurred within both groups from preoperative to final follow-up for PROMIS physical function and QuickDASH Wrist scores (<.05). Intergroup PROs were not significantly different at either time point. One patient in group 1 (2.8%) and 2 patients in group 2 (2.6%) returned to the operating room due to median nerve symptoms (>.05). A prophylactic CTR strategy is not associated with improved PROs compared with a symptomatic strategy during ORIF of DRF. [. 2023;46(6):e362-e368.].
桡骨远端骨折(DRF)常并发急性腕管综合征(CTS),如果未被识别,可导致正中神经永久性病变。一些外科医生建议在 DRF 的切开复位内固定(ORIF)中“预防性”行腕管松解(CTR)。DRF 固定时预防性与症状性 CTR 策略的患者报告结局(PRO)和安全性数据尚缺乏。我们对我院两种 DRF 管理策略进行了回顾性研究(2017 年至 2019 年)。第 1 组由 2 位外科医生进行手术,仅对急性 CTS 行 ORIF 和症状性 CTR。第 2 组由第三位外科医生进行手术,对所有患者(无论正中神经症状如何)均行 ORIF 和预防性 CTR。PRO 包括术前和末次随访时的 QuickDASH 腕部和 PROMIS 生理/心理健康评分。记录了人口统计学信息、并发症和重返手术室的情况。第 1 组(36 例)和第 2 组(76 例)在人口统计学上相似。第 1 组的损伤机制更严重(<.05),但两组术前 PRO 相似。第 1 组有 8 例(22.2%)因急性 CTS 行症状性 CTR。两组患者在术前至末次随访时 PROMIS 生理功能和 QuickDASH 腕部评分均有显著改善(<.05)。两组间任何时间点的 PRO 均无显著差异。第 1 组有 1 例(2.8%)和第 2 组有 2 例(2.6%)因正中神经症状而重返手术室(>.05)。与症状性策略相比,在 DRF 的 ORIF 中预防性 CTR 策略并不与 PRO 改善相关。[2023;46(6):e362-e368.]。