Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
USDA, ARS, U. S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 689332, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad072.
The objective of this experiment was to determine if supplying additional propionate to the rumen alters dry matter intake (DMI), feeding behavior, glucose metabolism, and rumen fluid metabolites in steers fed a finishing diet. Ruminally cannulated steers (n = 6) were fed a finishing diet ad libitum. Steers were randomly assigned to one of three treatments in a 3 × 6 Latin rectangle design with three 15 d periods. Treatments of no Ca propionate (Control), 100 g/d (Low), or 300 g/d (High) were ruminally dosed twice daily. Individual intake was measured using an Insentec feeding system. Pre-feeding blood samples were collected on day 7 and rumen fluid samples were collected on day 13. An intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) was conducted on day 14 and liver biopsies were collected on day 15. Liver samples were analyzed for expression of genes involved in gluconeogenesis. Data were analyzed using a mixed model with period, treatment, day, and their interaction included, with day and minute within period as a repeated measure and steer as a random effect. Meal size (P = 0.049), meal frequency (P = 0.046), and DMI (P < 0.001) were decreased in High steers. Day 7 plasma glucose (P = 0.23) and lactate (P = 0.47) were not affected by treatment, but insulin was decreased (P = 0.008) and non-esterified fatty acids were increased (P = 0.044) in the High treatment compared with the Control. Rumen fluid lactate was decreased (P = 0.015) in the High treatment compared with the Low treatment. Total VFA concentrations did not differ (P = 0.88) between treatments. There was treatment × time interaction for proportions of acetate and propionate (P < 0.001) and the acetate:propionate ratio (P = 0.005). The effect on acetate was due to a decrease in the High treatment 2 h after dosing the treatment. Propionate proportions were greater in the High treatment than the Control at all time points and differed from the Low except at 0 h. Propionate treatments had no major effects on the glucose and insulin parameters observed in the IVGTT other than a tendency (P = 0.09) for an increased insulin time to peak. These data indicate that exogenous propionate decreases DMI but the decrease in propionate from fermentation due to reduced DMI might negate the supply of exogenous propionate in VFA supply to the animal. Mechanisms other than hepatic oxidation of propionate might be responsible for DMI regulation.
本实验旨在确定向反刍动物瘤胃中额外添加丙酸是否会改变育肥牛的干物质采食量(DMI)、采食行为、葡萄糖代谢和瘤胃液代谢物。对 6 头安装有瘤胃瘘管的阉牛进行自由采食育肥日粮。采用 3×6 拉丁方设计,3 个 15d 期,将阉牛随机分为 3 种处理组之一。对照组(Control)不添加 Ca 丙酸,低剂量组(Low)每天添加 100g,高剂量组(High)每天添加 300g。使用 Insentec 饲养系统测量个体采食量。在第 7 天采集预饲前血液样本,在第 13 天采集瘤胃液样本。在第 14 天进行静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT),在第 15 天采集肝活检样本。分析肝样中参与糖异生的基因表达。采用混合模型进行数据分析,包括时期、处理、天以及它们的相互作用,天和分钟为重复测量,以公牛为随机效应。高剂量组的采食次数(P=0.046)、采食频率(P=0.046)和 DMI(P<0.001)降低。高剂量组第 7 天血浆葡萄糖(P=0.23)和乳酸(P=0.47)不受处理影响,但胰岛素降低(P=0.008),非酯化脂肪酸增加(P=0.044)。与低剂量组相比,高剂量组的瘤胃液乳酸降低(P=0.015)。处理之间总 VFA 浓度无差异(P=0.88)。处理与时间的交互作用对乙酸和丙酸的比例(P<0.001)和乙酸:丙酸比值(P=0.005)有影响。这种影响是由于在高剂量处理后 2 小时,处理中乙酸减少所致。与对照相比,高剂量组在所有时间点的丙酸比例均高于对照,除 0 小时外,也高于低剂量组。丙酸处理对 IVGTT 中观察到的葡萄糖和胰岛素参数没有主要影响,但胰岛素达峰时间有增加的趋势(P=0.09)。这些数据表明,外源性丙酸降低了 DMI,但由于 DMI 减少导致发酵产生的丙酸减少,可能会抵消动物丙酸在 VFA 供应中的外源供应。除了丙酸的肝氧化外,其他机制可能负责 DMI 的调节。