Department of Medicine, Wellbeing Services County of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Cardiology. 2023;148(3):246-256. doi: 10.1159/000530637. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
Haemodynamic gain index (HGI) is a novel haemodynamic parameter which can be obtained from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX), but its association with sudden cardiac death (SCD) is not known. We aimed to assess the association of HGI with SCD risk in a long-term prospective cohort study.
HGI was calculated using heart rate and systolic blood pressure (SBP) responses measured in 1897 men aged 42–61 years during CPX from rest to peak exercise. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was measured using respiratory gas exchange analysis. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were estimated for SCD.
During a median follow-up of 28.7 years, 205 SCDs occurred. The risk of SCD decreased gradually with increasing HGI (p value for non-linearity = 0.63). A unit (bpm/mm Hg) higher HGI was associated with a decreased risk of SCD (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-0.99), which was attenuated following adjustment for CRF. CRF was inversely associated with SCD, which remained after further adjustment for HGI (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77-0.94) per each unit higher CRF. Addition of HGI to a SCD risk prediction model containing established risk factors improved risk discrimination (C-index change = 0.0096; p = 0.017) and reclassification (net reclassification improvement [NRI] = 39.40%, p = 0.001). The corresponding values for CRF were (C-index change = 0.0178; p = 0.007) and (NRI = 43.79%, p = 0.001).
Higher HGI during CPX is associated with a lower SCD risk, consistent with a dose-response relationship but dependent on CRF levels. Though HGI significantly improves the prediction and classification of SCD beyond common cardiovascular risk factors, CRF remains a stronger risk indicator and predictor of SCD compared to HGI.
血流动力学增益指数(HGI)是一种新的血流动力学参数,可从心肺运动测试(CPX)中获得,但它与心脏性猝死(SCD)的关系尚不清楚。我们旨在通过一项长期前瞻性队列研究评估 HGI 与 SCD 风险的相关性。
使用 1897 名 42-61 岁男性在 CPX 期间从休息到峰值运动期间测量的心率和收缩压(SBP)反应计算 HGI。心肺运动能力(CRF)使用呼吸气体交换分析进行测量。使用多变量调整后的危险比(HR)(95%置信区间[CI])估计 SCD 的风险。
在中位随访 28.7 年期间,发生了 205 例 SCD。随着 HGI 的增加,SCD 的风险逐渐降低(非线性 p 值=0.63)。HGI 每增加一个单位(bpm/mm Hg),SCD 的风险就会降低(HR:0.84;95%CI:0.71-0.99),这一关联在调整 CRF 后减弱。CRF 与 SCD 呈负相关,在进一步调整 HGI 后仍然存在(每增加一个单位 CRF,HR:0.85;95%CI:0.77-0.94)。将 HGI 添加到包含既定危险因素的 SCD 风险预测模型中可以提高风险区分度(C 指数变化=0.0096;p=0.017)和重新分类(净重新分类改善[NRI]:39.40%,p=0.001)。对于 CRF,相应的值为(C 指数变化=0.0178;p=0.007)和(NRI=43.79%,p=0.001)。
CPX 期间较高的 HGI 与较低的 SCD 风险相关,与剂量反应关系一致,但取决于 CRF 水平。尽管 HGI 显著提高了常见心血管危险因素以外的 SCD 预测和分类能力,但与 HGI 相比,CRF 仍然是 SCD 更强的风险指标和预测因素。