Suppr超能文献

本科护理专业学生对儿童发热的处理方法:一项多中心调查。

Approach to fever in children among final-year nursing students: a multicenter survey.

作者信息

Milani Gregorio P, Corsello Antonio, Fadda Marta, Falvo Ilaria, Bianchetti Mario G, Peroni Diego, Chiappini Elena, Cantoni Barbara, Sannino Patrizio, Destrebecq Anne, Marchisio Paola

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Pediatric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via della Commenda 9, Milan, 20122, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2023 Apr 13;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01263-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unfounded concerns regarding fever are increasingly observed among nurses worldwide. However, no study has so far explored the preferred approach towards pediatric fever among nursing students. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the attitude towards pediatric fever among final-year nursing students.

METHODS

Between February and June 2022, final-year nursing students of 5 Italian university hospitals were asked to answer an online survey on their approach to fever in children. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were utilized. Multiple regression models were employed to explore the existence of moderators on fever conceptions.

RESULTS

The survey was filled in by 121 nursing students (response rate 50%). Although most students (98%) do not consider discomfort to treat fever in children, only a minority would administer a second dose of the same antipyretic in nonresponsive cases (5.8%) or would alternate antipyretic drugs (13%). Most students would use physical methods to decrease fever (84%) and do not think that fever has mainly beneficial effects in children (72%). The own know-how adequacy on fever was inversely associated (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.81) with the beliefs that high fever might lead to brain damage. No further predictive variable was significantly associated with the concern that fever might be associated with brain damage, the advice of physical methods use, and the assumption that fever has mostly positive effects.

DISCUSSION

This study shows for the first time that misconceptions and inappropriate attitudes towards fever in children are common among final-year nursing students. Nursing students could potentially be ideal candidates for improving fever management within clinical practice and amongst caregivers.

摘要

背景

全球护士中越来越多地观察到对发热毫无根据的担忧。然而,迄今为止尚无研究探讨护理专业学生对儿童发热的首选处理方法。因此,我们旨在调查护理专业最后一年学生对儿童发热的态度。

方法

在2022年2月至6月期间,邀请了意大利5所大学医院护理专业最后一年的学生回答关于他们对儿童发热处理方法的在线调查问卷。采用了定量和定性方法。使用多元回归模型来探讨发热观念中调节因素的存在情况。

结果

121名护理专业学生填写了调查问卷(回复率为50%)。尽管大多数学生(98%)不认为不适是治疗儿童发热的理由,但只有少数人会在无反应的情况下给予第二剂相同的退烧药(5.8%)或交替使用退烧药(13%)。大多数学生(84%)会使用物理方法来降低体温,并且不认为发热对儿童主要有有益影响(72%)。对发热自身知识的充足程度与认为高热可能导致脑损伤的信念呈负相关(比值比0.33,95%置信区间0.13 - 0.81)。没有其他预测变量与发热可能与脑损伤相关的担忧、使用物理方法的建议以及发热大多有积极影响的假设显著相关。

讨论

本研究首次表明,护理专业最后一年的学生中对儿童发热存在误解和不恰当态度的情况很常见。护理专业学生可能是改善临床实践和护理人员中发热管理的理想人选。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f334/10100172/cf241db4dd9f/12912_2023_1263_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验