Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。

JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.

作者信息

Siau Keith, Pelitari Stavroula, Green Susi, McKaig Brian, Rajendran Arun, Feeney Mark, Thoufeeq Mo, Anderson John, Ravindran Vathsan, Hagan Paul, Cripps Neil, Beales Ian L P, Church Karen, Church Nicholas I, Ratcliffe Elizabeth, Din Said, Pullan Rupert D, Powell Sharon, Regan Catherine, Ngu Wee Sing, Wood Eleanor, Mills Sarah, Hawkes Neil, Dunckley Paul, Iacucci Marietta, Thomas-Gibson Siwan, Wells Christopher, Murugananthan Aravinth

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall, UK.

University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):201-221. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102260. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the UK, endoscopy certification is awarded when trainees attain minimum competency standards for independent practice. A national evidence-based review was undertaken to update and develop standards and recommendations for colonoscopy training and certification.

METHODS

Under the oversight of the Joint Advisory Group (JAG), a modified Delphi process was conducted between 2019 and 2020 with multisociety expert representation. Following literature review and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations appraisal, recommendation statements on colonoscopy training and certification were formulated and subjected to anonymous voting to obtain consensus. Accepted statements were peer reviewed by JAG and relevant stakeholders for incorporation into the updated colonoscopy certification pathway.

RESULTS

In total, 45 recommendation statements were generated under the domains of: definition of competence (13), acquisition of competence (20), assessment of competence (8) and postcertification support (4). The consensus process led to revised criteria for colonoscopy certification, comprising: (1) achieving key performance indicators defined within British Society of Gastroenterology standards (ie, unassisted caecal intubation rate >90%, rectal retroversion >90%, polyp detection rate >15%+, polyp retrieval rate >90%, patient comfort <10% with moderate-severe discomfort); (2) minimum procedure count 280+; (3) performing 15+ procedures over the preceding 3 months; (4) attendance of the JAG Basic Skills in Colonoscopy course; (5) terminal ileal intubation rates of 60%+ in inflammatory bowel disease; (6) satisfying requirements for formative direct observation of procedure skills (DOPS) and direct observation of polypectomy skills (Size, Morphology, Site, Access (SMSA) level 2); (7) evidence of reflective practice as documented on the JAG Endoscopy Training System reflection tool; (8) successful performance in summative DOPS.

CONCLUSION

The UK standards for training and certification in colonoscopy have been updated, culminating in a single-stage certification process with emphasis on polypectomy competency (SMSA Level 2+). These standards are intended to support training, improve standards of colonoscopy and polypectomy, and provide support to the newly independent practitioner.

摘要

引言

在英国,当受训人员达到独立执业的最低能力标准时,会授予内镜检查认证。开展了一项基于全国证据的审查,以更新和制定结肠镜检查培训与认证的标准及建议。

方法

在联合咨询小组(JAG)的监督下,于2019年至2020年期间进行了一个经过改进的德尔菲法流程,有多个学会的专家代表参与。在进行文献综述以及推荐分级、评估、制定和评价评估之后,制定了关于结肠镜检查培训与认证的推荐声明,并进行匿名投票以达成共识。被接受的声明由JAG和相关利益相关者进行同行评审,以纳入更新后的结肠镜检查认证途径。

结果

总共在以下领域生成了45条推荐声明:能力定义(13条)、能力获得(20条)、能力评估(8条)和认证后支持(4条)。共识过程导致了结肠镜检查认证标准的修订,包括:(1)达到英国胃肠病学会标准中定义的关键绩效指标(即,无辅助盲肠插管率>90%,直肠反转率>90%,息肉检出率>15%+,息肉切除率>90%,患者舒适度<10%,中度至重度不适);(2)最低操作次数280次以上;(3)在过去3个月内进行15次以上操作;(4)参加JAG结肠镜检查基本技能课程;(5)炎症性肠病患者的回肠末端插管率>60%;(6)满足对操作技能形成性直接观察(DOPS)和息肉切除技能直接观察(大小、形态、部位、通路(SMSA)2级)的要求;(7)有在JAG内镜培训系统反思工具上记录的反思实践证据;(8)在总结性DOPS中表现成功。

结论

英国结肠镜检查培训与认证标准已更新,最终形成了一个强调息肉切除能力(SMSA 2级以上)的单阶段认证流程。这些标准旨在支持培训、提高结肠镜检查和息肉切除的标准,并为新独立执业者提供支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c32/10086724/b436e0c9f401/flgastro-2022-102260f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验