• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦基于调查和登记的抑郁症测量方法之间的一致性。

Agreement between survey- and register-based measures of depression in Denmark.

作者信息

Weye Nanna, McGrath John J, Lasgaard Mathias, Momen Natalie C, Knudsen Ann Kristin, Musliner Katherine, Plana-Ripoll Oleguer

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Disease Burden, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2023 Jun;147(6):581-592. doi: 10.1111/acps.13555. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1111/acps.13555
PMID:37057386
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Register-based studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) do not capture all prevalent cases, as untreated cases and diagnoses made by general practitioners are not recorded in the registers. We examined the prevalence and agreement of survey- and register-based measures of depression, and explored sociodemographic and health-related factors that may have influenced this agreement.

METHODS

All 32,407 participants in the 2017 Central Denmark Region How are you? survey were linked to hospital and prescription records. A checklist for depressive symptoms within the last 14 days (Major Depression Inventory; MDI) from the survey was compared with register-based assessment of hospital-diagnosed MDD and/or prescriptions for antidepressants. We estimated agreement between survey-based and register-based measures for depression and used logistic regression models to explore selected associated factors.

RESULTS

In total, 5.9% of How are you? survey participants screened positive for current depression on the MDI. Of these, 51.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49.0-53.6) filled a prescription for an antidepressant medication during the 10 years prior or 2 years following the administration of the survey, and 14.5% (95% CI: 12.9-16.2) were treated for MDD in a psychiatric hospital-based setting. When using a higher threshold of the MDI indicating more severe current depression, 22.8% (95% CI: 19.6-26.1) of those who screened positive also received an MDD diagnosis and 63.4% (95% CI: 59.7-67.2) were prescribed antidepressants during this 12-year period. Among those with current depression, female sex, older age, chronic diseases, hospital-treated self-harm, and being permanently outside the workforce were associated with having a register-based MDD diagnosis or antidepressant prescription. Among those with a register-based depression record, female sex, younger age, hospital-treated self-harm, stress, and severe loneliness were associated with current depression.

CONCLUSION

We found that as few as 15% of individuals with current depression in the general Danish population were captured by the psychiatric hospital register, while 51% of these individuals were identifiable in the prescription register. These findings demonstrate that register-based measures significantly underestimate the true prevalence of depression by identifying only the cases that are most severe.

摘要

背景

基于登记系统的重度抑郁症(MDD)研究无法涵盖所有患病病例,因为未治疗病例以及全科医生做出的诊断未记录在登记系统中。我们研究了基于调查和基于登记系统的抑郁症测量方法的患病率及一致性,并探讨了可能影响这种一致性的社会人口学和健康相关因素。

方法

2017年丹麦中部地区“你好吗?”调查中的所有32407名参与者与医院和处方记录进行了关联。将调查中过去14天内抑郁症状清单(重度抑郁量表;MDI)与基于登记系统的医院诊断MDD和/或抗抑郁药处方评估进行比较。我们估计了基于调查和基于登记系统的抑郁症测量方法之间的一致性,并使用逻辑回归模型探讨选定的相关因素。

结果

总体而言,“你好吗?”调查参与者中5.9%在MDI上筛查出当前抑郁呈阳性。其中,51.3%(95%置信区间(CI):49.0 - 53.6)在调查前10年或调查后2年内开具了抗抑郁药物处方,14.5%(95%CI:12.9 - 16.2)在精神病医院环境中接受了MDD治疗。当使用更高的MDI阈值表示当前抑郁更严重时,筛查呈阳性的人中22.8%(95%CI:19.6 - 26.1)也被诊断为MDD,并且在这12年期间63.4%(95%CI:59.7 - 67.2)被开具了抗抑郁药。在当前患有抑郁症的人群中,女性、年龄较大、患有慢性病、因自伤接受过医院治疗以及永久失业与基于登记系统的MDD诊断或抗抑郁药处方相关。在有基于登记系统的抑郁记录的人群中,女性、年龄较小、因自伤接受过医院治疗、压力和严重孤独与当前抑郁相关。

结论

我们发现,丹麦普通人群中当前患有抑郁症的个体,只有15%被精神病医院登记系统记录,而这些个体中有51%可在处方登记系统中识别。这些发现表明,基于登记系统的测量方法仅识别出最严重的病例,从而显著低估了抑郁症的真实患病率。

相似文献

1
Agreement between survey- and register-based measures of depression in Denmark.丹麦基于调查和登记的抑郁症测量方法之间的一致性。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2023 Jun;147(6):581-592. doi: 10.1111/acps.13555. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
2
Heterogeneity in 10-Year Course Trajectories of Moderate to Severe Major Depressive Disorder: A Danish National Register-Based Study.中度至重度重度抑郁症10年病程轨迹的异质性:一项基于丹麦国家登记册的研究
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;73(4):346-53. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.3365.
3
The association between depression and mortality - a comparison of survey- and register-based measures of depression.抑郁症与死亡率之间的关联——基于调查和登记的抑郁症测量方法的比较
J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 1;210:111-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.024. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
4
Vascular Pathology and Trajectories of Late-Life Major Depressive Disorder in Secondary Psychiatric Care.二级精神保健中的血管病理学与晚年重度抑郁症的病程。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;26(3):386-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
5
Infertility-related stress and the risk of antidepressants prescription in women: a 10-year register study.不孕相关压力与女性抗抑郁药物处方风险:一项 10 年登记研究。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Aug 1;34(8):1505-1513. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez110.
6
Prevalence of depression, quality of life and antidepressant treatment in the Danish General Suburban Population Study.丹麦普通郊区人口研究中的抑郁症患病率、生活质量及抗抑郁药治疗情况
Nord J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;68(7):507-12. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2013.877074. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
7
Social inequality in the prevalence of depressive disorders.抑郁障碍患病率的社会不平等。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jul;63(7):575-81. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.082719. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
8
Socioeconomic position, symptoms of depression and subsequent mental healthcare treatment: a Danish register-based 6-month follow-up study on a population survey.社会经济地位、抑郁症状与随后的精神卫生保健治疗:一项基于丹麦登记数据的人群调查 6 个月随访研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 3;8(10):e020945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020945.
9
[Depressive symptoms during anorexia nervosa: State of the art and consequences for an appropriate use of antidepressants].[神经性厌食症中的抑郁症状:最新进展及合理使用抗抑郁药的影响]
Encephale. 2017 Feb;43(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
10
[Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in French general practice using the patient health questionnaire: comparison with GP case-recognition and psychotropic medication prescription].[使用患者健康问卷评估法国全科医疗中精神障碍的患病率:与全科医生病例识别及精神药物处方的比较]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):560-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.06.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and determinants of eating disorder risk behaviours among adult women in Denmark: findings from nationwide cross-sectional health surveys between 2000 and 2023.丹麦成年女性饮食失调风险行为的患病率及影响因素:2000年至2023年全国横断面健康调查结果
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01318-7.
2
Mental Disorders in Danish Hospital Registers: A Review of Content and Possibilities for Epidemiological Research.丹麦医院登记册中的精神障碍:流行病学研究的内容与可能性综述
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 16;17:387-407. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S509147. eCollection 2025.
3
Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality associated with mental disorders: a population-based cohort study.
与精神障碍相关的死亡率中的社会经济不平等:一项基于人群的队列研究。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;24(1):92-102. doi: 10.1002/wps.21278.
4
Identifying genetic differences between bipolar disorder and major depression through multiple genome-wide association analyses.通过多项全基因组关联分析识别双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症之间的基因差异。
Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;226(2):79-90. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.125. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
5
Social disconnectedness, subsequent medical conditions, and, the role of pre-existing mental disorders: a population-based cohort study.社交隔离、后续医疗状况以及既往精神障碍的作用:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024 Dec 23;33:e81. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000829.
6
Risk and timing of postpartum depression in parents of twins compared to parents of singletons.与单胎父母相比,双胞胎父母产后抑郁的风险和时间。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Feb;151(2):163-172. doi: 10.1111/acps.13766. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
7
The HOPE cohort: cohort profile and evaluation of selection bias.HOPE 队列:队列特征和选择偏倚评估。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Aug;39(8):943-954. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01150-4. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
8
Enhancing the accuracy of register-based metrics: Comparing methods for handling overlapping psychiatric register entries in Finnish healthcare registers.提高基于登记的指标的准确性:比较在芬兰医疗保健登记系统中处理重叠精神科登记条目方法。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024 Jun;33(2):e2029. doi: 10.1002/mpr.2029.
9
A comprehensive analysis of age of onset and cumulative incidence of mental disorders: A Danish register study.精神障碍发病年龄与累积发病率的综合分析:一项丹麦登记研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2024 Jun;149(6):467-478. doi: 10.1111/acps.13682. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
10
Associations between psychosocial work environment factors and first-time and recurrent treatment for depression: a prospective cohort study of 24,226 employees.职业心理社会环境因素与首发和复发抑郁治疗的相关性:一项对 24226 名员工的前瞻性队列研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024 Mar 18;33:e13. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000167.