Haghpanah Fardad, Hamilton Alisa, Klein Eili
One Health Trust, Washington, D.C., USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vaccine X. 2023 Mar 26;14:100287. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100287. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Influenza viruses are constantly evolving through antigenic drift, which makes vaccines potentially ill-matched to circulating strains due to the time between strain selection and distribution. mRNA technology could improve vaccine effectiveness (VE) by reducing this time. Significant private and public investments would be required to accommodate accelerated vaccine development and approval. Hence, it is important to understand the potential impact of mRNA technology on influenza hospitalizations and mortality.
We developed an age-stratified dynamic model of influenza transmission to evaluate the potential impact of increased VE (increased protection against either infection or only hospitalization) on hospitalizations and mortality in the United States. We assume that mRNA technology allows for delaying the time to strain choice, which might increase efficacy, but it does not reduce the time needed for distribution and administration, which might reduce availability. To assess this tradeoff, we evaluated two scenarios where strain choice was delayed until late summer resulting in a more effective vaccine available to (1) all age groups by October, or (2) adults 65 years and older starting in August.
If not available until October, the vaccine would need a minimum of 95% effectiveness against infection to see a decrease in hospitalizations and deaths in all age groups. When delayed until November, even a 100% effective vaccine had no significant impact. For the elderly, the minimum required VE (against infection) was 50% to reduce hospitalizations and deaths. Moreover, a vaccine with 80% VE against infection available in August for the 65 + age group was better than a 95% effective vaccine available in October for all ages.
As the majority of influenza-associated hospitalizations and deaths are in adults 65 years and older, a combination policy targeting higher VE and coverage for this age group in the short term would be the most efficacious.
流感病毒通过抗原漂移不断进化,这使得疫苗在毒株选择和分发之间的时间间隔内可能与流行毒株不匹配。信使核糖核酸(mRNA)技术可以通过缩短这段时间来提高疫苗效力(VE)。需要大量的私人和公共投资来适应加速的疫苗研发和审批。因此,了解mRNA技术对流感住院率和死亡率的潜在影响很重要。
我们建立了一个按年龄分层的流感传播动态模型,以评估在美国提高疫苗效力(增强对感染或仅对住院的防护)对住院率和死亡率的潜在影响。我们假设mRNA技术允许推迟毒株选择时间,这可能会提高效力,但不会减少分发和接种所需的时间,这可能会降低可及性。为了评估这种权衡,我们评估了两种情况,即毒株选择推迟到夏末,从而使更有效的疫苗能够(1)在10月前提供给所有年龄组,或(2)从8月开始提供给65岁及以上的成年人。
如果直到10月才可用,疫苗对感染的效力至少需要达到95%才能使所有年龄组的住院率和死亡率下降。如果推迟到11月,即使是100%有效的疫苗也没有显著影响。对于老年人,降低住院率和死亡率所需的最低疫苗效力(针对感染)为50%。此外,8月为65岁及以上年龄组提供的对感染效力为80%的疫苗,比10月为所有年龄组提供的95%有效疫苗更好。
由于大多数与流感相关的住院和死亡发生在65岁及以上的成年人中,短期内针对该年龄组提高疫苗效力和覆盖率的联合政策将是最有效的。